User talk:Brockhole8

Proposed deletion of Bradley wright

Hello, Brockhole8. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Bradley wright, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Bradley wright to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 01:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bradley Wright for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradley Wright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Wright until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 03:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm YuMaNuMa. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Wright without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 07:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Bradley Wright. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 07:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:YuMaNuMa, you may be blocked from editing. Webclient101^talk 07:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bradley Wright

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bradley Wright, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Authority was changed by Brockhole8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854135 on 2013-01-21T07:17:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Authority with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to M&M's with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User:Jim1138. Jim1138 (talk) 08:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 13:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]