User talk:Broadway91

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Los Angeles, California in The Bold and the Beautiful. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Ubardak (talk) 05:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:List of Characters

Category:List of Characters, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 05:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Martyfeldman.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Martyfeldman.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ChristopherFitzgerald.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ChristopherFitzgerald.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mel Brooks Characters

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Mel Brooks Characters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of Mel Brooks Characters. Tikiwont (talk) 08:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

an article about a real person, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YooTuba (talk • contribs) 22:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Long Road To Life‎. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Dawn bard (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Soapfan91

Who is that?Broadway91 (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

Archiving another user's talk page? You are walking on very thin ice... J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frederick Frankenstein

The article Frederick Frankenstein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No out-of-universe notability, no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frederick Frankenstein for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick Frankenstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Frankenstein (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]