User talk:Bro Dude51

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

September 2018

Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Qatar Airways have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Denniss (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Qatar Airways. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:12, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please dont attack other users or you will be blocked from editing. I have given you the benefit of the doubt as you are new and not blocked you straight away for you edit summaries on Qatar Airways but if you make any sort of threat, intimidation or attack on other editors you may not get another warning. Have a read of Wikipedia:No personal attacks and consider how to treat others here. If you have an issue then you need to raise it on the article talk page, take care and please think before you type. MilborneOne (talk) 17:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been undoing this york so just put the pics back. There is no overload.

Bro Dude51

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Mjroots (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bro Dude51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22628 was submitted on Sep 11, 2018 15:28:51. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bro Dude51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been helping others and I have not been distruptive. Bro Dude51 (talk) 13:15, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have added image galleries to articles after being repeatedly asked not to and having your additions repeatedly reverted. You have also made demands of other editors instead of working in a collaborative manner such as through talk page discussion. Both of those qualify as disruption. You may have good intentions, but your postings have not reflected that and give the sense of a battleground attitude. As you do not recognize that you were disruptive, I do not believe it would benefit Wikipedia to unblock you at this time. As such, I am declining your request. To be unblocked, you will need to recognize that you were disruptive and tell what steps you will take to avoid being so in the future. 331dot (talk) 13:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bro Dude51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Despite my attempts to help Wikipedia, I admit distruptive editing is not permitted on Wikipedia. I can add an article if there is a picture overload. I will try my best not to do it again. As such, I would like to be unblocked as quickly as possible. Bro Dude51 (talk) 13:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While this is heading in the right direction, it's not really coherent enough for me to unblock. Please add a new request explaining:

why your actions were disruptive
what you will edit if the block is removed

Your responses will help us assess whether or not you should be unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello. I was making distruptive edits but I was not noticing it while making the edits. I was trying my best, but I should to it undistruptively.

Despite the refusal to unblock after your second request here, it does seem that you might realise why your editing was disruptive.

Many aircraft and airline articles already have sufficient images in them. So, the question of what images to use comes down entirely to the image's quality and encyclopedic value. It does not matter who took the image (OK, I've not checked whether or not the following applies here), some editors edit war to get images they have taken into articles, even when their images are of inferior quality. Regardless of this, some of your edits could be construed as edit warring.

If you are willing to give an undertaking not to flood articles with images, then I am willing to unblock. However, should you return to previous behaviour a block may be reapplied without warning by any admin.

If you want to replace any images in aircraft/airline articles, it would probably be best to make a suggestion on the article's talk page. Suggested images may either be posted there, or linked to by adding a colon (:) before the word "File" in the Wikilink. Mjroots (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}}

I've de-activated this unblock request as it appears you have already been unblocked. SQL ^{Query me!} 07:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bro Dude51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Despite my distruptive editing, I understand that doing this is not okay and I will not do it again. My strategy (sorry if I spelled that wrong) is on the Qatar Airways page, is to actully remove the image of the A350 beause I have a Qatar Airways fleet article good and finished. As soon I get unblocked, I will put in as a Wiki. I hope this suits you because everyone makes mistakes.

Accept reason:

OK, as discussed I'm unblocking you. Should you repeat the behaviour that led to the block, you will be reblocked. It will then be much harder to convince any admin to unblock you. Mjroots (talk) 20:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have been unblocked, you may remove the block notices and appeals if you wish. Mjroots (talk) 20:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mjroots: (edit conflict) As expected, unblocking was not a good idea. You may want to see the Qatar Airways and Qatar Airways fleet history. This user keeps doing exactly what they did before the block. By taking a look at this [1] it seems this user took the unblock as an endorsement of their actions.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you resumed doing the exact same thing that you were doing that got you blocked in violation of the agreement above, I am reimposing the block. 331dot (talk) 15:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Beat me to it. Good block. SQL ^{Query me!} 15:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well, you just can't help some people. Can't say that there wasn't fair warning given. Mjroots (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot, user is making personal attacks on talk page - recommend revoking talk page editing privileges. Kirbanzo (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot, SQL, and Mjroots: Since this user is blocked it seems appropriate to block 178.153.248.14 (talk · contribs) too.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jetstreamer: there's more than one way to skin a rabbit. Mjroots (talk) 16:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note for anybody reviewing unblock requests, suspected sockpuppet User:178.153.111.2 has been intimidating other users at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation#Qatar Airways fleet. MilborneOne (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bro Dude51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22798 was submitted on Sep 28, 2018 15:05:04. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]