User talk:BritishSpaniard
November 2023
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Owen Jones, you may be blocked from editing. This edit summary makes it clear that you absolutely should not be editing the Owen Jones article. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry if that offends you wokie, but it's all sourced and true. Cope harder. Will report to admin if you revert again.
- Have a good day BritishSpaniard (talk) 22:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ah just seen you are an admin. Ofcourse you are LOL. This website is run by you leftys. The edit summary fair enough, but the content in the article is neutral, contains none of my personal analysis and is all sourced? Which part specifically do you have a problem with, or do you just not like other LGBT people being criticised? BritishSpaniard (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Please familiarize yourself with WP:BLP — particularly the section on sourcing. While you're at it, you might want to check out WP:CIVIL. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Read it hundreds of times. Which part specificially is not sourced/poorly sourced? Lmao. Most of them have multiple sources. BritishSpaniard (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Then you would know that we don't cite tweets or YouTube videos (without any secondary reliable sources suggesting those tweets are inherently noteworthy) as you've done with claims that Jones "attacked Suella Braverman" or that he believes the IDF has committed war crimes in Gaza. You would also know we don't use op-eds for controversial statements about BLPs, as most of the other sources are. It's clear you have a vendetta against this individual and are seeking to portray him in a negative light, and as I've already said, it is clear you should not be editing this article. It would be easiest if you made that decision voluntarily. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Read it hundreds of times. Which part specificially is not sourced/poorly sourced? Lmao. Most of them have multiple sources. BritishSpaniard (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Please familiarize yourself with WP:BLP — particularly the section on sourcing. While you're at it, you might want to check out WP:CIVIL. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ah just seen you are an admin. Ofcourse you are LOL. This website is run by you leftys. The edit summary fair enough, but the content in the article is neutral, contains none of my personal analysis and is all sourced? Which part specifically do you have a problem with, or do you just not like other LGBT people being criticised? BritishSpaniard (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Which part specifically is unsourced? BritishSpaniard (talk) 22:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 22:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC)- I don't listen to people with pronoun mental illness. woke/clown BritishSpaniard (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- 👍 — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 22:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)