User talk:Britespox
Britespox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
unblock me please
Decline reason:
Clearing an autoblock
Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:
- If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache. - Try to edit the Sandbox.
- If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
- Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.
If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Mangojuicetalk 15:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Can you cut and paste the message you get when you try to edit a page? I can't find a block, so I suspect you are autoblocked or covered by a larger IP rangeblock. Syrthiss (talk) 15:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
This is almost certainly the new account of Spritebox (talk · contribs), who was recently blocked for a month. There'd be no reason to unblock him, and indeed his blocks might need to be extended for block evasion. DreamGuy (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Britespox - is this true? I would not be of a mind to extend your original block as you haven't successfully evaded it, but if this is the case, you ought to admit it, let this account be blocked, and serve your block, or things will likely get worse from here. Mangojuicetalk 17:40, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- This account has, in fact, made edits to the mainspace and not just user talk pages, which would be block evasion. I'm not sure if they are currently blocked on this account or if they put the notice here to try to get their main account unblocked, but if this one is not blocked it should be. DreamGuy (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- ...one of those edits being to User talk:Spritebox. Ok, that convinces me. Indefblocked. Mangojuicetalk 20:42, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- This account has, in fact, made edits to the mainspace and not just user talk pages, which would be block evasion. I'm not sure if they are currently blocked on this account or if they put the notice here to try to get their main account unblocked, but if this one is not blocked it should be. DreamGuy (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2009 (UTC)