User talk:Brijmohanmadaan

February 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 01:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur

A tag has been placed on Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 21:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur

Hello Brijmohanmadaan. An editor has complained about your new article, and you've been removing some tags from it that are intended to draw attention to problems that need fixing. Your removal of the tags tends to defeat collaboration, and is viewed here as edit warring. Please open a discussion about the article problems, for example, on the article's Talk page. I suggest you take a break from modifying the article itself until you and Eeekster can have a proper discussion, and anyone else who wants to give an opinion. If you continue to revert others' changes to the article, without discussing, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Shri Krishan Pranami Mandir, Jaipur has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - Philippe 01:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]