User talk:Briguy9876

Re:ROBLOX

Thanks Briguy, I had a feeling they would be removing it shortly. The unmade ROBLOX page is currently under syops rule (Only a Wikipedia Syops can create/ edit it). I talked to the syops that locked the page and he said there was 0% chance of it being unlocked.

I found the page that I am working on now, and it was very inacurate. I am trying to get some substance into it before they decided that ROBLOX isn't worth it and block the whole game from Wikipedia. Thanks for the suggestions, I appreciate any help. Thanks! --Gordonrox24 (talk) 11:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Re:ROBLOX

I wanted to wait for you to relpy before I did anything else regarding ROBLOX on Wikipedia. I have no intentions of Taking your article as my own, I am just pushing to get ROBLOX a good solid article On Wikipedia.

I would love to help out on your article, and they when it is done aproach a syops/admin about re-instating the original ROBLOX page. My first and foremost concern is getting a credible Page that is encylopeida material. Your article is a good starting point and I hope we can further it's substance and accuracy to meet wikipedia's standards. Once again, I apreciate your help, and am willing to give you any help needed in getting a page up and running. Thanks!--Gordonrox24 (talk) 01:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page

Hello, just wanted to say thanks for cleaning up my edits. I will spend some time looking for better references.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 21:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roblox

No problem, I will work on it.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 12:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, PM me on roblox I check those messages more often then my talk page on Wikipedia, Thanks!--Gordonrox24 (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hello, I went through the history and restored all of the references. One of them appears to be broken, while another I am not sure how it relates to the article or roblox.com. You can go through and put them where you like now. Thanks--Gordonrox24 (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Reference

I found This page Mabye you can look through it. I think it may make a good reference.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 02:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Thanks for getting the protection. Hope it helps.--gordonrox24 (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

link

The discussion can be found here.--gordonrox24 (talk) 20:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um...

You should fix your page since the Roblox article is back on the mainspace. Jeremjay24 _msg 00:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Roblox

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Roblox. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roblox (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Eg grens colorw.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Eg grens colorw.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Eg grens colorw.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Eg grens colorw.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:21, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eg_grens_colorw.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eg_grens_colorw.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Atomicbeachball (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Community Consolidated School District 59

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Community Consolidated School District 59, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 03:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]