User talk:BrightonC

BrightonC, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi BrightonC! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Takei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rollbacker

I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. 18:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)– Gilliam (talk)

Thank you. I was not aware of this feature but now that I've been granted the right to utilize it, rest sssured I will exercise discretion and use it only for its intended purpose.--BrightonC (talk) 00:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Ncmvocalist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cell division, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ncmvocalist (talk) 17:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I intended only to remove a random (and unsourced) statement added by an IP user who was seemingly test-editing. If my edit did anything other than that, it was accidental.--BrightonC (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Major edit/Under Construction Template

Hello! I was just doing a major edit on the United States presidential election, 2016 article. I put up a "major edit" template at the top of the article to warn other editors to wait to make their edits so that I could finish mine. That was we could avoid an edit conflict... I can't tell you how much work could have been lost had there been a conflict. I did see that you made an edit while I was making mine. Because they were in different sections, there was no conflict. It's really not a big deal at all and I'm not upset or anything but I would ask that you look for those templates before making changes. Thank you! PrairieKid (talk) 00:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the lateness in responding, but I didn't see the message when it posted, as I logged out immediately after making the aforementioned edit. I did see the template, but I figured that since my edit did not alter the content in any way, it wouldn't be a big deal. I have to admit I didn't think about the potential consequences of an edit conflict. I will now take that into account for future reference, so thanks for the message. If you don't mind a suggestion, it is probably best to copy the content or post it in your sandbox first before adding a considerable amount of content to any article. That way, you insure yourself against lost content resulting from an edit conflict or technical foul-up. Cheers!--BrightonC (talk) 17:57, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BrightonC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]