User talk:Briefplan

To leave a comment, please start a new section by clicking here.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Briefplan! I am Snowolf,I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 21:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Your recent edit to Black Hawk Down (film) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 13:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grrr. Stupid bot. Briefplan (talk) 13:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phi and semitone

Hello, Briefplan!

Thanks for your interest in the Mathematical Coincidence page. Please check it again, to find what I was writing to you when I entered an editorial conflict with that other editor. He has misquoted me, and has somehow convinced you that a "concensus" supports the deletion of my contribution. Please, take your time. Examine the entire matter independently, and come to your own conclusions. (I am not asking for your support, but simply that your thoughts be clear of the influence of one other editor.)

Thanks again for your interest, Prof.rick (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I'm sorry if there has been any misunderstanding, but I believe I have no bias in this situation (I just stumbled across it in RC, and have little interest in the article subject), and having reviewed everything, looking at both your talk pages, and the Mathematical coincidence and Golden ratio article histories and their talk pages, I'm going to stand by my original decision. Although I admit I can't find the other user which User:Dicklyon mentioned, I still believe that he and myself, presenting our rational arguments, constitutes a consensus. We have tried to convince you of our views, and you have tried to convince us of yours, so I'm afraid we must agree to disagree. I'm sorry this couldn't work out better. Briefplan (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Briefplan,

No offence taken! You have stated your case in a logical and understanding way. Of course, we can't all agree on everything!

Wikipedia can only work with such understanding. Thanks, Prof. rick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof.rick (talk • contribs) 08:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Josh Hartnett Black Hawk Down.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Josh Hartnett Black Hawk Down.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Country lists

Wikipedia:WikiProject Country lists, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Country lists and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Country lists during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Error

Hi,

Your svg image of population density on the Overpopulation page contains an error. You have marked India as 1000+ people per square km. The actual density is only 397 people per sq. km. Please make the necessary changes. Thank You. SOURCE: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=india —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.254.65.167 (talk) 16:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, in that image http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Countries_by_population_density.svg India is colored in the second-darkest brown, which stands for 300-1000 people per sq km. So that's correct. But the color is too similar to the next one for 1000+. These categories should use colors that are easy to tell apart.

There's only one country in the last category, Monaco. This seems outdated, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependent_territories_by_population_density has 6 countries with a 1000+ population density.

But Briefplan seems to have left, so maybe someone else who has the skills could update this graphic? Please? --87.157.90.244 (talk) 15:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it seems like South Korea should be in the 100000-500000 range rather than 50000-100000 in the svg image of population density. 77.251.169.64 (talk) 18:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Population density map

I was looking at this map: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Densit%C3%A9_de_population#/media/File:Countries_by_population_density.svg that you made since I just made something similar here: http://www.populationpyramid.net/population_density/belgium/2006/

We have very different numbers for the density: for example, in India, for 2006, your map says that there are more than 1000 people/km2

There were approximately 1162 million people in India in 2006 for a surface of approximatively 3.287 million km2. This should give a population density around 350 people per km2, not 1000+

Where do you think is the mistake?

Madewulf (talk) 13:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]