User talk:Bridge70002

January 2012

Under Wikipedia's policies about how we write about living people, it is not allowed to insert content, especially potentially contentious content such as the content you added at New Orleans crime family, without providing a citation to a reliable source supporting this content. I've accordingly removed it; if you are considering whether to insert it again, please review the relevant policies first, and provide a reliable source to support the addition. Thank you, and welcome to Wikipedia.--Arxiloxos (talk) 07:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources? These people do not have "sources". I am the source. He has stepped down due to illness. If you want to keep deleting posts, you should at least do some research before attempting to be "the smart guy". You deleted "Italian American" and replaced it with "Italian-American". It's "Italian American", smart guy.

Your latest edit at my talk page [1] could be viewed as a violation of Wikipedia's strict policy against making legal threats. Please see Wikipedia:No legal threats for more information. As far as the New Orleans crime family article is concerned, Wikipedia policy is clearcut: information has to be verifiable in reliable sources that other editors can check. If it isn't, we don't use it. And we are especially careful about WP:BLP|contentious allegations concerning living people]]. I've looked, and I've found absolutely nothing to verify your claims. If you want to contribute constructively here, you'll need to learn and follow the policies. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Legal threats? I work in the law enforcement industry. I will order an investigation of you if I wish. I don't understand why you would protect Carmine Blaine Marcello unless you were being paid. You need to learn and follow the laws of the United States government.

Notice of discussion at WP:ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Users Bridge70002 and Arxiloxosworksformafia (legal threats and BLP violations at New Orleans crime family). Thank you.--Arxiloxos (talk) 01:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for BLP violations, legal threats, attacking other editors, and multiple account abuse. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bridge70002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can provide verifiable sources for my information. I did not quite understand the policy on making legal threats but, I do now. Please unblock me so I can add information that is historical and very important.Bridge70002 (talk) 02:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The creation of the sockpuppet account to attack the user who tried to deal with your disruptive edits and this attack [2] are ample reason for indefinite blocking. Acroterion (talk) 03:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have more to do than that. You also created User:Arxiloxosworksformafia, which violates at least two policies. And you don't have to be unblocked to "add information". You can do so here, but be careful as WP:BLP violations will be removed.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]