User talk:Bricks10
August 2009
[edit]Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Philip Bloom, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please do NOT remove references from articles. Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Philip Bloom, you will be blocked from editing. If you remove referenced material again on this article, you will be blocked. Please reference any additions, and get consensus for any deletions or major changes on the article's talk page. Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
[edit] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Philip Bloom, you will be blocked from editing. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
January 2010
[edit]{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)- Once your block is expired, I encourage you to help make the Philip Bloom more balanced, but do not continue to remove referenced information and replace it with unreferenced material. Instead, take a few minutes to read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Then write a draft of proposed additions and discuss them at Talk:Philip Bloom to get consensus for your changes. Continuing to blank out material without consensus will lead to more editing blocks.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bricks10. Thank you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
DELETING CONTENT
[edit]
Please provide me with some info on how i can have this Philip Bloom subject DELETED ENTIRELY.
As far as sockpuppetry, this is not true, the other account is not mine, and I'm sure that "Activist4HumanRGHT5" will have his input.
.
Request to delete Philip Bloom wiki article .
[edit]I am aware of Wikipedia’s rules regarding changes to existing pages on the web site. Nevertheless, I would like to make a formal request with Wikipedia that it immediately remove Mr. Bloom’s page from Wikipedia’s site.
Phil Bloom’s past record is not of public interest and he is not a public figure. Mr. Bloom’s Wikipedia page was originally created by an individual with the malicious intent of tarnishing Mr. Bloom’s reputation, and Mr. Bloom has since been the victim of an active campaign of threats to his personal safety and that of his family. These threats have been initiated by anti-semitic and other extremist groups relying upon, amongst other things, the information published by Wikipedia. Please refer to the following web sites for further clarification:
- ^ Antisemitic protestant website article (jewwatch.com)
- ^ [http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=627707 Public racist and antisemitic postings on “White Pride Forum” (stormfront.org) ]
- ^ "White civil rights" website antisemitic postings (whitecivilrights.com)
Wikipedia’s continued maintenance of Mr. Bloom’s page, along with actual threats received by Mr. Bloom in Romania, are seen as serving to encourage continued threats of violence against Mr. Bloom and his family. Accordingly, we appreciate your attention to our request and hope that Wikipedia will delete Mr. Bloom’s page without undue delay.
In the meantime, we will monitor Wikipedia for compliance. Signed: Activist4HumanRGHT5 . January 6th 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons may be of some help to you. However, be aware that all of the sources in the article are easily available on the internet, so pursuing deletion of the article may not be of any help.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)