User talk:Brickrogger

You have been blocked as a self-admitted sockpuppet of User:Nathanrdotcom whose community ban was supported by the Arbitration Committee proceedings at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Nathanrdotcom. As a banned user, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's an impersonator. Let's think about this logically: Why would someone blocked by ArbCom evade their block then publicly admit to it? Wouldn't that be just a really stupid move to make? I think this is just someone looking for his 15 minutes of fame by admitting he's a sockpuppet of a former user. If we were to get picky, Nathanrdotcom often referred to himself using a small n, as in "nathanrdotcom" not "Nathanrdotcom". Skult of Caro (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is an impersonator. Nathan said so himself on Wikipedia Review. Please change the user page template out of fairness to Nathan. Everyking 07:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the block reason should probably be changed as well to something like "Disruption", no? Skult of Caro (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]