User talk:BrickBreak

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Hitro talk 14:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

And I hope I'm not seeing a junior editor telling me what to do, going WP:SHOPPING and giving me WP:KUDZU for simply giving responses to users that are keen on bending WP policy, and are using dodgy argumentative methods to do so. Regardless of the means and ends, if something is wrong, then it is wrong, and arguing about myself won't make it any more right. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 05:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, I apreciate you keeping the personal discussion off the article. I failed to do it...
Moving on. First, I did NOT shopped policy. I dislike people who cannot have a logical discussion in wiki, just spamming WP: links, and trust me, I am not one of them or will become one. What I wrote is what I saw. As I say in my page, I am not a policy expert, nor do I aim to be one.
Second, any policy, within WP or not, is made to be applied with some flexibility. As I said in the talk page, blatant policy violations are one thing. But the strictness with which you are enforcing them on the article is harming it. Of course you're gonna interpret this as another guy who has a problem with the policies and is trying to make a point in a rondom page instead of in the proper place. That's not what I mean. Just think twice, and especially wait before deleting anything with potential.
And last, and I'll be a little blunt here, cut that out. Seriosly. Calling editors juniors, kids, or worse (cunts, was it?) is as wrong as incorrect. In the internet, just as in real life, age (or amount of time spent in X or Y) is of no matter to me, and I do not descriminate over that. I suggest you don't, too.
One final thing. As I said before, I'm not here to lecture anyone. What I wrote above is nothing but suggestions. So don't take them as offensive (especially in the second paragraph), just because they're not coming from someone who's been here longer than you. And if you do take them as offensive... well, I guess we know what that proves. Respectfully, BrickBreak (talk) 20:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Transformice

An article that you have been involved in editing, Transformice, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformice. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.