Jump to content

User talk:Brianmykel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RE: Violence in Video Games

[edit]

http://www.soc.iastate.edu/sapp/VideoGames1.pdf This is major proof.

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Do+violent+games+lead+to+aggression%3F-a0341863767 is the source. It has been more or less used to quote the entire section, providing a lot of postulates with no actual sources to back it up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Definition_of_a_source

when i say the "source" i meant the article itself, not the writer. The article itself is unreliable as a source.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Biased_or_opinionated_sources

It is obviously an opinionated article, which isn't the problem. The problem is that it is presenting opinions as facts or studies with no references or citation.

I can't see how this can ever be considered a reliable source. The actual studies / experiments mentioned should be found instead and cited.


I don't see why this article has been removed. That resource is very reliable. What is your reasoning saying that it isn't?