User talk:Brian Muema

Welcome!

Hello, Brian Muema, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Djoser Nederland, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Garsh (talk) 18:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Djoser Nederland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Djoser Nederland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Garsh (talk) 18:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Djoser Nederland (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Djoser Nederland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brian Muema! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jimfbleak you recently unblocked my page for using wikipedia for Spam or advertising. My account has been blocked without prior warning. I agree I made a mistake and this will not happen again.

I blocked you, but you havn't been unblocked by me or anyone else Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brian Muema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a good contributor to wikipedia and learning in the process. Please unblock my account as this will not happen again. For my next steps I shall abide on all the rules and go through the the pages I need to go through again to equip my self with the guidelins. In addition ,Prior warning had not been made to me.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brian Muema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fully understand why my account has been blocked, and I sincerely apologize for my previous actions. After reflecting on my behavior, I acknowledge that I misused Wikipedia in a way that goes against the platform's guidelines and values. I deeply regret spamming Wikipedia and now realize the importance of contributing in a meaningful and constructive manner.

Moving forward, I am committed to offering content that is valuable to Wikipedia's users. I will focus on making thoughtful, well-researched contributions that enhance the quality of the encyclopedia. I respectfully request that my account be unblocked so I can have the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to contributing positively to the Wikipedia community. I have learned from my mistakes and am eager to correct my past behavior. Brian Muema (talk) 07:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't accept bot/AI written requests(99% certain according to GPTzero). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you. Please write your request in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in chronological order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply", the reply function does not work well in every situation. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brian Muema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am fully aware of my mistake ; Using wikipedia for spam or to get links is absolutely wrong. I have read the guidelines and I am fully aware of the wikipedia guidelines. It has been 2 years since I had this account. I have made significant contributions.However, my issues started when I tried to create a copy page for my company's client title; Djoser Nederland. This will not happen again. I have agreed with my employer not to use my account to do such. I will use my personal account for wikipedia's benefit and to benefit the readers of wikipedia to give valuable content. I am humbly requesting you to please reinstate my account so that I can continue to make right contributions towards wikipedia. Learning is an ongoing process we learn as we go. Having learnt this lesson, It will not happen again. Thank you for your consideration. Brian Muema (talk) 11:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were so close but I was looking for you to say what topics you might edit about as "personal edits", and I would like to see a stronger commitment to refrain from editing about your employer anytime soon. Maybe the next admin will feel differently, but I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, please place new posts below older posts at the bottom. This will be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, you will abandon efforts to edit about your employer? What will you edit about instead? 331dot (talk) 12:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will strictly use this account for my personal edits as I used to . If am to edit for my employer under a a request task, the content will be strictly well researched and informed for the users of wikipedia. Besides this I am also careful to follow the guidelines before creating a new draft that will get my account into bad books again. Thank you. Brian Muema (talk) 13:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brian Muema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Wikipedia Admin, I humbly request my wikipedia blocked account to be reviewed for unblocking. I really acknowledge I was wrong by spamming wikipedia by creating a page that was against wikipedia guidelines. I have gone through all required guidelines and this will not happen again. I have forgone to use my account for this purpose. Moving forward, I would only want to contribute to wikipedia as I was doing before. This is the first time I am encountering this. I have been a good editor all along.I was trying to be a bit creative, but it did not turn out well. Please give me another opportunity. Thank you for your consideration

Decline reason:

Could you be more specific about what topics you want to edit, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 16:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Brian Muema (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]