User talk:Brettalan
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Brettalan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!DUBJAY04 05:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Barack Obama presidential acceptance speech, 2008
[edit]Could you explain what this was all about? Everyme 21:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
I thought the reference was fairly self-evident, but I've added two references. Does that answer your question? Brettalan (talk) 01:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Absolutely, sorry for bothering you. I didn't recognise the reference and overeagerly assumed a bit of a joke because it wasn't mentioned in the source next to the assertion. All cleared up now, thank you. Everyme 11:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Tagging of Tagged
[edit]Re [1] – well said. Just letting you know I've created an off-line draft of an AN/I report; if this nonsense continues, that may be the next step. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 06:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support - it is appreciated Ucanlookitup (talk) 07:54, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks guys. Adrian, it looks like we may need that report. Brettalan (talk) 01:52, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- This is getting ridiculous. I was saying to Ucan before that I'm not sure ANI would be helpful – issues that are complex or that concern mainly content can end up simply ignored, and this is both. But the constant going around in circles wastes time and risks contributing to burn-out, though you've been incredibly patient so far.
- What I'm thinking is that it may be useful to create a FAQ, similar to what's at Talk:Evolution or Talk:HIV. The idea would be to address often-repeated questions as objectively as possible, refering closely to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Then, when someone asks a question related to what's in the faq, rather than repeating ourselves over and over again we can simply refer to the faq. A faq may also be useful for any future ANI report, as it would be much easier to show someone was being disruptive if their "arguments" failed to address a succinct and compelling faq answer, rather than expecting admins to wade through the gigantic Talk:Tagged and its archive. I've started an off-line draft, but I doubt I'll get time to finish it til Sunday. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 14:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- It's worth a try. Ultimately I think it's a question of whether or not the dispute is a good faith disagreement, or simply COI editing. Either way, though, we should make our point as clearly as possibleUcanlookitup (talk) 22:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- You've got mail. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 07:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's worth a try. Ultimately I think it's a question of whether or not the dispute is a good faith disagreement, or simply COI editing. Either way, though, we should make our point as clearly as possibleUcanlookitup (talk) 22:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Tagged article notice
[edit]Hello, Brettalan. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
WikiProject The Beatles
[edit]Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us. | |||||||
Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!
|
Best, yeepsi (Talk tonight) 17:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Chicago barnstar!
[edit]The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thanks for your message on Twenty 1. My primary focus is on biographies, and I'm working with some artists to have a comprehensive representation of their lives. Nowadays I'm mainly working on all things Chicago and I just wrote Walfredo Reyes, Jr.. I'm considering the possibility of starting a Chicago task force at least for a time, but let's see if we can build a body of citations, reviews, stories, and sales figures if you're interested in committing resources to the articles about the band! Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 20:49, 30 April 2013 (UTC) |
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ringo (TV movie), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bad Boy (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks...I meant to check on the link before posting but forgot about it. It's fixed now. Brettalan (talk) 09:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Brettalan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Brettalan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)