User talk:Brennan1111

August 2023

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 23:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t Brennan1111 (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my deletion of bias Brennan1111 (talk) 23:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to discuss things with other editors rather than embarking on a one-person crusade against what you assert is "bias." Acroterion (talk) 23:57, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop calling religious text fictional because that is biased and you cannot spread atheistic bias Brennan1111 (talk) 00:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brennan1111 you are not alone nor should you listen to acroterion, he is deeply involved in a misinformation plan and uses his fake online "wiki editor" status garbage to push what the puppeteers tell him to. Dont argue with idiots brennan itll make your head hurt... 174.213.162.150 (talk) 08:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's enough. Casting aspersions toward Acroterion and making accusations like this without supplying evidence is absolutely unacceptable. Compliance with Wikipedia's civility, harassment, and no personal attacks policy is not only required for all users, but is also a condition of your ability to edit here. Any further violations of policy will not be tolerated - this is your final and only warning. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah and the attack page that was deleted. Doug Weller talk 19:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Noah's Ark, you may be blocked from editing. —DIYeditor (talk) 01:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not I made the article more neutral Brennan1111 (talk) 01:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the [ reply ] button or properly utilize WP:INDENT and WP:THREAD. Please see the discussion on the article talk page at Talk:Noah's Ark. Make sure you indent your replies there (just use the reply button). —DIYeditor (talk) 01:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They keep adding bias how do I stop them from calling Noah’s ark fictional instead of biblical Brennan1111 (talk) 00:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may discuss it on the article talk page. —DIYeditor (talk) 01:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i agree with you these people are agenda pushing puppets sorry man we have little power 174.213.162.150 (talk) 08:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Making attack pages is not a way to convince people. 2nd block. Doug Weller talk 19:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? When did I make an attack page? Brennan1111 (talk) 20:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Donald Albury 12:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block

Because of your persistent tendentious editing of Noah's Ark in contravention of our Neutral point of view policy, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing that article. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 21:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]