User talk:Brendazambon

Welcome!

Hello, Brendazambon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The project page can be found at: Wikipedia:Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on your article

Hello Brendazambon, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

Intro sentence: the information is there, the order in what it is presented needs improvement.
Links: Missing!
Headers: Please create headers as shown on cheatsheet, not by making them bold.
References: Good start, but we need more.
Context/timeframe: Missing
How was the book received: Missing
Other: The description of the chapters is presented too much like a book report. The article is supposed to be an article in an encyclopedia that describes the book.

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 10:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brendazambon, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.

Intro sentence: With last session I showed examples and gave instructions how to create the first sentence with translation. I do not understand why you missed that, this should have been ready by now, so I changed it for you. Now it is okay.
Links: Thank you for adding links. Much better! You may find some more keywords.
Headers: Please change "The book received" to "Reception". Please make the text in bold in the section "Contents" as headers '''...''' -> === ... ===
References: Thank you for adding more sources. The number of different sources is sufficient for now, but we need more references. Both in the sections "Reviewed" and "Timeframe" I need more references. You may use a reference more than once. Please add if possible also references in the section "Contents" to where certain parts come from in the book, like the chapter or page.
Context/timeframe: great!
How was the book received: Great that you started with this section, but we do like to read more. What does the reviewer say (more) about the book?
Other: The text under the section "Contents" has improved well!

Please work on the references and the reception, two main focus points. Romaine (talk) 02:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brendazambon, I add the images of the book to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]