User talk:Brehaut10

Brehautism

This is not an established religion. Wikipedia has certain notability criteria that article must conform to. Unless you can come up with reliable sources that demonstrate the notability of Brehautism, I'm afraid it won't be an article. ... discospinster _talk 20:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brehautism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Brehautism was changed by Brehaut10 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-04-24T22:25:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Brehautism has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 22:27, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did to the page Brehautism. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 22:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this "article" per your request. It may be recreated if, and only if, you can convince an Admin that it deserves to be here; and the best of luck with that one. Rodhull andemu 22:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]