User talk:BreezewoodPA

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:11, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Doug Mastriano) for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 05:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that this is a fairly lenient sanction for what appears to be POV-pushing. I remind you that you are already subject to much harsher Arbitration enforcement sanctions without warning, in both the American politics and BLP subject areas; you have already been notified of this. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 05:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Repeated threats of sockpuppetry is disruptive editing. Cullen328 (talk) 00:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Breezewood, that comment was despicable. Cullen328, thank you for the block. Adakiko, thank you for reverting it. Cullen, I'm going to drop a CU block on User:BreezewoodPA74. Breezewood, if 74 is the year of your birth you should certainly know better. The result of all this is that you will not be able to do anything on the Mastriano article, and you have made it more unlikely that you will get your way there. Drmies (talk) 00:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

~Swarm~ ^{sting} 01:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]