Jump to content

User talk:Bratzwq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bold text

April 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Identified, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please provide a reference to information you add. When people remove your unreferenced material, don't just add it back, get a reference first. NrDg 14:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to So Much for You constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 14:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Brenda Song, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You were recently in a edit war Kanonkas :  Take Contact  15:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Surfer-boy94 (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for adding dubious, unreferenced misinformation to articles. Please review WP:RS and back up your additions when you resume editing.. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NrDg 16:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vanessavma4.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vanessavma4.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Bratzwq!
We thank you for uploading Image:200px-SoMuchforYou.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 15:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Cdcomingsoon.JPG. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NrDg 16:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are asking for another block

[edit]

STOP adding unsourced or original content, as you did to Lindsay Lohan‎ and Hilary Duff‎. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. And I wonder if you could explain why you randomly placed the words "Music Video" in the middle of a section in this edit? Please stop violating Wikipedia policies and making nonsensical edits. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you continue this type of editing you will be blocked again, and second blocks are for longer time periods. Ward3001 (talk) 16:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for adding nonsense, dubious & unreferenced misinformation to articles continues immediately after previous block.. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NrDg 16:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Lindsay Lohan, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 17:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for adding nonsense, dubious & unreferenced misinformation to articles continues immediately after previous block ended. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NrDg 18:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]