User talk:Branstarx3

hi Branstarx3, thanks for your update. But alone updating the one graph is not a good idea. This brings data inconsistency on the page in many places. So, it will be helpful if you change data at all the places it requires. Let me know what is your thought by writing on my talk page.

June 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to Kahlon appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 09:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Branstarx3, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Branstarx3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shubhangi Swaroop has been accepted

Shubhangi Swaroop, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Toppr. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 05:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Bangalore riots

We're just trying to help. Also please see when and how to use templates, such as the one of "semi-protected" and "block". SerChevalerie (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are some Vandalism in edits with random IP address Branstarx3 (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Branstarx3, I know, but Template:Semi-protected and Template:Uw-block can only be used by administrators. You can give users warnings, such as Template:Uw-vandalism1. Best regards, SerChevalerie (talk) 15:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SerChevalerie thanks for your help Branstarx3 (talk) 15:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

August 2020

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to 2020 Bangalore riots, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment i appealed for protection of page 2020 Bangalore riots as some miscreants are trying to give it communal colour and indulge politics in article , also one of the user made bigotry comment on my talk page who i attempted to blocked, fellow contributors are welcomed even i am here as a contributor but vandalism would not be accepted in name of contribution. Branstarx3 (talk) 15:43, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Branstarx3, appeals for page protection go to WP:RPP. SerChevalerie (talk) 18:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Copyvio

Hi, you added two images from the internet, which were not shared into the public domain. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia and Wikimedia's copyright policies, particularly those on images. Further, do NOT remove deletion templates from your work, as only administrators are permitted to do so (generally speaking). Violations of the above will get you blocked in the future. SerChevalerie (talk) 18:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I

Agree with decision Branstarx3 (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Branstarx3, see Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. In general, images published by anyone else CANNOT be used, unless they were published before 1960. If you want to add images to Wikimedia Commons, try to click pictures yourself and publishing them to Commons. Alternatively, contact the photographer and request them to do so. SerChevalerie (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks, and can we use from free public domain? If yes then where Branstarx3 (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Branstarx3, yes, of course, but you need to check the licensing to make sure that it is in public domain first. Eg. Bollywood Hungama releases all their images of events, parties, etc. in the public domain. So does the Press Information Bureau, which is why we have such high-quality images of politicians. SerChevalerie (talk) 15:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i see , thanks Branstarx3 (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SerChevalerie (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Branstarx3 (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

August 2020

Your recent edits to Talk:Violence against Muslims in India could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 13:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article u mentioned is already giving impression which is not good for Wikipedia as it has many issues in facts morphed and written with a motive , mention of Narendra Modi in article is heavily politically/ideologically motivated ignoring the fact that Modi has nothing to do with 2002 Gujarat riots as by Supreme Court of India and the author of article has blindly ignored Official Notice and judgement of Supreme Court of India ^[1] Wikipedia allows NPOV and that article clearly seems to violate this policy Branstarx3 (talk) 13:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ANI#Legal threats by Branstarx3 — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 13:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with any such Legal Threat, WP:ANI#PA Branstarx3 (talk) 13:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Billhpike

Sorry! I am reverting my edits to Talk:Violence against Muslims in India which as by u could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that i may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Which is not the fact actually. Still, following wiki policy i am reverting my edits on talk page of article mentioned above.Branstarx3 (talk) 13:58, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia! — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 14:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Article deletion

Is done via wp:afd.Slatersteven (talk) 14:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Slatersteven your notice about article deletion is not having enough information , like it starts with "is done via" Branstarx3 (talk) 14:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you think an article should be deleted you nominate it following the instructions in the link I provided.Slatersteven (talk) 14:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion/help , but i already stepped backed from issue of deleting article Branstarx3 (talk) 14:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its as much for future reference, it may not be the only article you may think should be deleted.Slatersteven (talk) 14:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i may use this in future contributions

Thank you Branstarx3 (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ "No evidence against Narendra Modi, says Supreme Court-appointed team: 10 facts". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2020-08-13.

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Welcome

Hello, Branstarx3, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Branstarx3, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Delhi Riots

I noticed that you discussed about 2020 Delhi Riots on 2020 Bangalore Riots Talk page. Please let your opinion be heard on this page: [1]. Cwarrior (talk) 04:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

oaky Branstarx3 (talk) 04:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Branstarx3! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 05:25, Friday, August 14, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Deletion of old Prod notice at Talk:Tahir Hussain (politician)‎

You really shouldn't be touching anything in talk page headers right now, you are too new. That was there to point out that there had already been a WP:PROD so that other editors would be unlikely to do a new one. Doug Weller talk 14:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

okay , but can i try that creating new one in sandbox for same person Tahir Hussain ? Means i have created few articles and i want another opportunity, before that i would like to know what was issues with Tahir Hussain (politician) article that it was nominated for deletion. Branstarx3 (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Branstarx3, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Hussain (politician). SerChevalerie (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

using templates in comments

Hi. I appreciate your participation in deletion discussions. Just one pointer: kindly do not use templates in comments. They are rarely used at english wikipedia, and in most use-cases they are used by administrators or clerks, for other reasons. Even they don't use the templates in normal comments. I would recommend you to observe other editors, and follow the pattern (only in technical editing, not in personal opinions/views). If you have any questions, or doubts then please feel free to ask me. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 22:16, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that there's a good reason for this convention; there are limits to how many templates can be transcluded on a page, and even if you are substing the template, it's often adding pointless html. If you're uncertain what substing and transcluding mean, don't worry about it, but the bottomline is that plain text is preferable unless there's good reason to use a template. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aug 2020

This [[2]] violates wp:npa, do not accuse those who you are in dispute with of being paid agents, without a better reason then "they do not agree with my edits".Slatersteven (talk) 13:21, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DO not remove other users comments as you seem to have done here [[3]].Slatersteven (talk) 13:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 00:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Embibe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Embibe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 1292simon (talk) 01:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toppr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toppr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toppr (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 09:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Consortium of Medical, Engineering and Dental Colleges of Karnataka

Hello, Branstarx3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Consortium of Medical, Engineering and Dental Colleges of Karnataka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Embibe

Hello, Branstarx3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Embibe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "No evidence against Narendra Modi, says Supreme Court-appointed team: 10 facts". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2020-08-13.

[1]