User talk:Brandter

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user subpage at User:Springs_Window_Fashions/Springs_Window_Fashions may not be appropriate to be indexed by external search engines as presently written. Typically, this could be because it appears promotional, or contains material in development or archived that doesn't yet meet policies and guidelines. I have tagged this page as "noindex", which allows editing but minimizes the page's inclusion in search engine results.

If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add {{db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, you can change the page so that it more clearly meets Wikipedia guidelines, or you can edit it as normal and ignore the tag completely (it will not affect editing).

However, please do not remove the tag without discussion. Thank you. TacitSilence (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Conerns

TacitSilence - I am new to posting pages to Wikipedia, so any advice you could offer me on this matter would be greatly appreciated. This comment affects all that you had tagged (see below). Springs Window Fashions is the second largest blinds and shades manufacturer/seller in the world, behind Hunter Douglas. I was hoping to provide more information about the history company and the different brands and products we have to offer. By no means is this meant to be promotional but purely informational. Could you please explain further what elements of this appear to be promotional in content? That way I can work to rephrase or remove certain sections. I do feel I provided relevant sources, but please let me know if this needs to be improved as well. Currently there is just not a lot of outside information about the company and its brands (Bali, Graber, and Nanik). Also - I noticed another user came in and deleted these pages entirely without first consulting with me on the matter. These pages were simply draft pages waiting to be posted - is there a way to get this information back to continue with the draft/edit stage or is it lost? Thank you so much for your help. I truely appreciate any guidance you can give me in regards to your conern.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user subpage at User:Springs_Window_Fashions/Graber®_Blinds may not be appropriate to be indexed by external search engines as presently written. Typically, this could be because it appears promotional, or contains material in development or archived that doesn't yet meet policies and guidelines. I have tagged this page as "noindex", which allows editing but minimizes the page's inclusion in search engine results.

If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add {{db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, you can change the page so that it more clearly meets Wikipedia guidelines, or you can edit it as normal and ignore the tag completely (it will not affect editing).

However, please do not remove the tag without discussion. Thank you. TacitSilence (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user subpage at User:Springs_Window_Fashions/Bali®_Blinds may not be appropriate to be indexed by external search engines as presently written. Typically, this could be because it appears promotional, or contains material in development or archived that doesn't yet meet policies and guidelines. I have tagged this page as "noindex", which allows editing but minimizes the page's inclusion in search engine results.

If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add {{db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, you can change the page so that it more clearly meets Wikipedia guidelines, or you can edit it as normal and ignore the tag completely (it will not affect editing).

However, please do not remove the tag without discussion. Thank you. TacitSilence (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Springs Window Fashions. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.TacitSilence (talk) 00:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Springs Window Fashions

The article Springs Window Fashions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Aside from one local article saying it's "billed as the second-largest provider of custom window-covering products in the world", I found no considerably better coverage to suggest better solid notability and improvement. WP:TNT at best if better is ever available.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]