User talk:Brandmeenn

Brandmeenn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Brandmeenn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm NotTheFakeJTP. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SummerSlam (2016), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JTP ^(talk) 18:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brandmeenn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Your conflict with MatthewTardiff is becoming disruptive and your changes to the articles have been expressed as controversial (therefore they should be discussed on the articles talk page first). This exchange with MatthewTardiff also appeared uncivil. Please refrain from edit warring and reverting each others edits and collaborate on each articles talk page if necessary when a problem arises. If you need dispute resolution, please see the link above for help. -- Dane ^talk 19:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions without sources

Why do you keep on deleting key parts of articles without sourcing them, if you don't know your wrestling history please look it up MatthewTardiff 17:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC) MatthewTardiff 17:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MatthewTardiff (talk • contribs)

Because the section is already short, it should be combined now. Brandmeenn (talk) 17:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A administrator will be messaging you i tried being civil with you and you don't wanna hear it so I reported you for vandalism and more MatthewTardiff 17:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC) MatthewTardiff 17:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm not vandalizer, I wanted to helping Pro Wrestling articles, it's not vandalism. If you have a evidence, tell us. Brandmeenn (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have to provide a source and I've been trying to help you out the name of articles that contain for instance GFW invasion is the name of the article and that has been provided with a source, which you can't change things like that unless you have a source proving otherwise MatthewTardiff 18:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC) MatthewTardiff 18:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MatthewTardiff (talk • contribs)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MatthewTardiff, User:Brandmeenn reported by User:Dane (Result: ). Thank you. —-- Dane ^talk 01:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brandmeenn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WWE SmackDown Women's Championship.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWE SmackDown Women's Championship.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]