User talk:BradleyRidgemont

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BradleyRidgemont (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Indefinite blocks are not defined a permanant. This block was made a longe time ago and I have reason to believe that it was NOT done "per ruling of Jimbo Wales, or the Arbitration Committee, because it was never discussed amongst them. Even though I know and admit I was very much in the wrong by my actions, I don't think it warrented an indefinite block and again, I don't think the Arbitration Committee even talked this over. Besides, this was many months ago and I have learned the error of my ways, I wish to return to Wikipedia and make useful contributions. Simply put, if I can be given another chance, I will do this website well. Thank you.BradleyRidgemont 04:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well considering that no positive contributions have been made to the encyclopedia it would seem apparent that this is a sockpuppet account created solely for the purpose of making personal attacks against Srikeit (talk • contribs), I am extremely hesitant of unblocking this account with further cause being given. -- Netsnipe ► 04:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.