User talk:Bradhall71

University of Melbourne edits

Hi Bradhall77,

Regarding the claim of the page 'commonly considered to be Australia's most prestigious university', I checked the supplied sources and they both referred to the University of Melbourne as Australia's most prestigious university. Neither source was, as you noted in your edit summary, concerned with the particular standing of the University of Melbourne. However, both articles apparently considered that this statement was uncontroversial, as no rankings or other information was supplied. This indicated to me, when I reverted your edits, that the sources did in fact support the statement. I'd be interested to hear your views on this.

Cheers, Tlönorbis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlönorbis (talk • contribs) 04:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UNSW

In future some reading on this subject could help but anyone who knows the history of the University of NSW knows that it requires an act of parliament to change the official sanctioned name of the university as was done with the change from NSWUT to UNSW in 1958. A branding change does not affect the official name of the university and that's what this is: I have added the 'UNSW Australia' brand name after the official title and that's common practice on Australian university pages. Also remember to reference your work and provide reasons or comments on your edits and maybe dispute like this won't happen. Regards, Siegfried Nugent (talk) 07:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claude Sammut

The article Claude Sammut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability criteria; neither WP:GNG nor WP:NACADEMIC. Sammut is occasionally interviewed in coverage relating to the RoboCup (1, 2), but this does not constitute the significant coverage required to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Actualcpscm (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]