User talk:Brachy0008/Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rainbow Friends (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Roblox games. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems to fail WP:GNG with a lack of reliable sources writing about the game. The game already has an entry on the Roblox list and any additional coverage should be added there instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rainbow Friends and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doors (game) (February 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Drmies was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Drmies (talk) 03:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you need is secondary sources, not tweets. Drmies (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brachy0008! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drmies (talk) 03:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Taipei University of Marine Techonlogy light rail station has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Taipei University of Marine Techonlogy light rail station. Thanks! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shalun light rail station (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shalun light rail station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elevator to another world

Hello, Brachy0008. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elevator to another world".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taipei University of Marine Techonlogy light rail station (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taipei University of Marine Techonlogy light rail station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Chengchi University metro station (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Philipnelson99 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Chengchi University metro station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taipei University of Marine Technology light rail station has been accepted

Taipei University of Marine Technology light rail station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Chengchi University metro station (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some ideas for expansion - construction, background (the need for a station there?) etc. See if there are any other sources available which cover these sorts of things.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Chengchi University metro station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your constant dedication to high quality edits. Your work is appreciated, and I hope to see you around in the edit logs! ~ Mycranthebigman of Alaska ^_^ 18:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by nominations

Please do not nominate articles for Good article status without consulting significant contributors, per WP:GAN/I#N1. Drive-by nominations are discouraged and often hurt the article's chances of becoming a GA in the long term. Sounder Bruce 07:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! I’ll be sure to take note of that. Sorry for the “drive-by nominations” Brachy08 (Never Gonna Give You Up, Never Gonna Let You Down) 08:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Chengchi University metro station (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You've made no real improvements since the last decline. The one source added is primary and non-independent (the agency which operates the system). This will not be accepted if you cannot show significant coverage in secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Chengchi University metro station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA

I am concerned that the two articles which you approved are not good articles. I have found issues with both. I have made comments at Bayfront MRT station and at the GA Talk page. Bruxton (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me the two sources which you spot-checked? Brachy08 (Never Gonna Give You Up, Never Gonna Let You Down) 08:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said more at the nomination. Please see the new hook I proposed there and comment at the nomination. Bruxton (talk) 19:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the new hook fits DYK better than the original. Maybe use the alternate one instead. (FYI, my IP address is autoblocked because some vandal that uses the same IP address as my iPad vandalised Melon). Brachy08 (Never Gonna Give You Up, Never Gonna Let You Down) 23:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request for 129.126.39.248

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Brachy0008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Shojer". The reason given for Shojer's block is: "vandalism, see also edit filter log"

Blocking administrator: ‪Materialscientist‬ (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Block softened as you have been editing for three years or so without a problem. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]