User talk:Brablg

Please leave me comments with your signature , Thank you Brablg (talk) 23:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on article

This article is very complete and well organized. However, it has some problems with grammar and tone that need to be fixed before it can be published. Therefore, I am rating it '2' - not quite ready. For example, in the second sentence - "an open affront on behaviorist psychological paradigms". An affront is an insult or offense, usually to a person. And you don't make an affront on, but to. The right word is attack - I imagine you changed attack to affront while paraphrasing from another source. You need to carefully proofread this article and make corrections like choosing the right words and correcting grammatical errors.

Other problems: 1. When you refer to authors, like Fancher and Rutherford, you must insert a reference citation. 2. Refer to him as Neisser, not Ulrich 3. Don't use colloquialisms like "stealing the spotlight." Formal, encyclopedic tone is necessary.

These fixes should be fairly quick and easy. J.R. Council (talk) 01:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]