User talk:Bpoic

February 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Harold Godwinson. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.
You are quite clearly the same editor as 108.31.127.78 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Favonian (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Widr (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harold Godwinson

FYI a discussion has been started at Harold_Godwinson#Pointless_edit_war_King_of_England_vs_King_of_the_English, please explain why you think "King of the English" is the correct form.--KTo288 (talk) 11:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point may also be of interest.--KTo288 (talk) 11:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]