User talk:Boyfriendtogirlsaloud

Speedy deletion nomination of Busan-lotte-tower-02

A tag has been placed on Busan-lotte-tower-02, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Intelligentsium (talk) 20:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 151 Incheon Tower, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Astronaut (talk) 10:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that when you change important details, such as completion dates for skyscrapers, it is important to supply a reference saying in which reliable source you found that information. It would also be useful if you used the edit summary to at least provide an explanation of your actions. Thank you. Astronaut (talk) 11:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dalian Eton Center

A tag has been placed on Dalian Eton Center, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Quiggers1P (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

I note that you are continuing to change the completion dates of some buildings without supplying a reliable source or even a reason in the edit summary. Obviously, some articles say completion in 2009 and you have quite rightly changed the completion date to 2010 when construction is still continuing, but in other cases you just appear to add a random year or two without reason and occasionally remove valid references while doing so. Such actions are considered by some to be vandalism, but I am trying to assume good faith here and think you might have access to a source. Can I suggest you read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or simply take a look almost any article to see how references are created. Astronaut (talk) 00:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Supercar

I noticed you used "supercar" as a class for several automobile articles. After much discussion WikiProject Automobiles has decided to not use "supercar". For the relevant discussions, see these links:

swa q 15:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Start article

Can you start Linked Hybrid ? http://www.stevenholl.com/project-detail.php?id=58 Won some high profile awards and a notable building. Thanks.respect 76.65.20.46 (talk) 05:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Automobile classification

Nomination for deletion of Template:Automobile classification

Template:Automobile classification has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mighty Antar (talk) 00:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Renfe class 104

A tag has been placed on Renfe class 104, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mhking (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved

I moved your article to User:Boyfriendtogirlsaloud/Renfe class 104 as it can't stay in article space, half of it is nonsense. Guy (Help!) 21:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

Please use the preview function (next to save page) before submitting your work. This way you will see what the page will look like beforehand. Thanks Tommy (msg) 21:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop. Now

You copied the article on Renfe class 104 straight back into article space. You may not do that. It is full of gobbledegook. I moved a copy to you user space (see above), work on it there until you've fixed the problems otherwise you'll be blocked for disruption. Guy (Help!) 12:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Chevrolet cars timeline 1980 to date. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Sable232 (talk) 13:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yantai Shimao No.1 The Harbour

The article Yantai Shimao No.1 The Harbour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Grossly out-of-date article, and a quick internet search didn't seem to indicate much notability either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 00:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]