User talk:Boy695434

Welcome!

Hello, Boy695434, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. – Uanfala (talk) 21:19, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The intro of the Sambalpuri article tries to represent the best sources available. If you'd like to make changes to that, you'd need to find reliable sources supporting those changes, see how they compare with the sources supporting the current wording, and then explain that on the talk page and get consensus. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jayadeva have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 17:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boy695434! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. You have done this numerous times. Marking edits as minor when they aren't is often done to avoid scrutiny, so not only isn't it incorrect, it can make editors wonder why you do it. Doug Weller talk 17:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]