User talk:Boxstaa

Welcome!

Hello, Boxstaa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions relating to roads. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you wish to continue editing U.S. road-related articles, please become familiar with the Wikipedia and U.S. Roads standards by checking out User:Rschen7754/Manual.

Additional road article-related questions can be answered at the following links: United States, Canada, or other countries. You may also ask questions at my talk page.

Feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads on IRC as well.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian and a roadfan! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Again, welcome! --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music Bait and Switch

I've reverted your posts about music on Bait and Switch as they are totally fucking weird. Feel free to rebut on the talk page.Linguistixuck (talk) 16:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Moore's law, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 06:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Bands named after places

I have nominated Category:Bands named after places (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Sport utility vehicle. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. swa q 17:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Donkey Kong, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. swa q 16:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Eminem. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. swa q 16:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Twinstowel.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Twinstowel.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Non-Interstate Route numbers in the United States that are freeway in its entirety

I have nominated Category:Non-Interstate Route numbers in the United States that are freeway in its entirety (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Brian Powell (talk) 23:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Interstate highways concurrent with another numbered highway in its entirety

I have nominated Category:Interstate highways concurrent with another numbered highway in its entirety (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. KelleyCook (talk) 21:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to expressway have been reverted

You need to travel a bit more (to see the difference between expressways and freeways) and read some of the law of expressways (which I have, since I personally added all those citations to freeway and expressway) before adding unsubstantiated edits to the expressway article. --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Innuendo songs

Category:Innuendo songs, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 23:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Oxymorons

Category:Oxymorons, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 10:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Live Your Life, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 07:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stadium Rave

A tag has been placed on Stadium Rave requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 02:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Stadium Rave

I have nominated Stadium Rave, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stadium Rave. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jenuk1985 | Talk 14:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Starter Battery

Can you explain your rationale for renaming Car Battery - and any consultations with anyone that may have had any bearing on this?

Thanks. --Speedevil (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Motherboards with built-in keyboards

Talk:Starter battery#Requested move

Please comment at Talk:Starter battery on whether or not this article should be moved to Car battery. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DVDVideoSoft

The article DVDVideoSoft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Concerns, per templates, not addressed. No RS provided.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Table of voltages

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Table of voltages. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Table of voltages. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of APM Music

A tag has been placed on APM Music, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 22:27, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Garden Party (blarsa song)

A tag has been placed on Garden Party (blarsa song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alan^(T)(E) 05:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Your talk page is full of deletion notices, and one particular section of original research warnings, so I'm attempting to lend a friendly hand. =) Please read over the article wizard. Additionally, as a more specific pointer, "8K google hits, and 101K views, [...] 12K downloads on Newgrounds within a year" is not enough reason for inclusion on Wikipedia; please remember that it is an encyclopedia, so please take a look at Wikipedia:Notability if you get a chance. Cheers. Alan^(T)(E) 05:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Failure, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Caraudiobicycle.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Caraudiobicycle.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Color sequels of black and white films

Category:Color sequels of black and white films, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 02:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Radiohuffymod.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Radiohuffymod.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bikebellwire.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bikebellwire.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Radiohuffymod.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Radiohuffymod.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Non-motorized use of 12 volt systems

The article Non-motorized use of 12 volt systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a fundamentally encyclopedic topic. Uses for a specific voltage warrant nothing more than a footnote in an appropriate article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Songs about poverty

I have nominated the above category, which you created, for deletion. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films starring actors portraying characters with the same first name

Category:Films starring actors portraying characters with the same first name, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 11:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video gaming operating systems

Category:Video gaming operating systems, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video gaming operating systems has been nominated for discussion

Category:Video gaming operating systems, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SJK (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]