User talk:Boxingfan1995
Tyson Fury
[edit]I didn’t notice your edit regarding defeating two long reigning world champions, sorry for reverting. It might still be removed by another editor for whatever reasons but by all means add it back. – 2.O.Boxing 07:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Boxingfan1995, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Devin Haney. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 02:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eddie Hearn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liam Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Tyson Fury
[edit]As you can see here, Fury is not currently ranked as the number 1 by the TBRB. Until the rankings are updated, this is speculation (regardless how right the speculation is). The Ring has not yet updated their rankings, however, the whole world watched as he was awarded The Ring magazine belt and announced as The Ring magazine champion, therefore, the mention of The Ring ranking becomes redundant. It’s already mentioned he holds the title. – 2.O.Boxing 21:23, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
World boxing rankings
[edit]As stated in MOS:BOXING#Rankings, ESPN is a credible ranking system to be used in the lead; "Pound for pound or weight class rankings by The Ring magazine, Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, ESPN and BoxRec may be included if a boxer has been ranked inside the top ten at any point in their career. Include at least a year when this occurred, with sources from the official websites." – 2.O.Boxing 13:41, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Tyson Fury shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have ignored both attempts at discussion, both of which have directed you to the boxing manual of style that explicitly states ESPN rankings are acceptable, and you’re now at three reverts. If you revert again then you will be reported at WP:ANEW. – 2.O.Boxing 17:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Leeds United F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Govvy (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
I am not disruptive editing. I am editing a page which clearly hasn't had a lot of attention and their is no the actual or sourced information that I am adding to the page. I am new to editing so if I have made any mistakes then please let me know but don't revert any edit without a significant reason please. Boxingfan1995 (talk) 02:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marcelo Bielsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argentino.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Commentary in articles
[edit]Your edits at Rodrigo De Paul are being reverted as they are inappropriate. We don't add commentary to articles and material needs to be in an encyclopedic tone.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Savannah Marshall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English Martyrs School.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |