User talk:Bowmister

Speedy deletion of Bladder hammer

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Bladder hammer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 21:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I would like proof the Bladder Hammer does NOT exist, for I own one and have described it perfectly. -Bowmister

It's up to you to provide reliable references to show the Bladder Hammer exists. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is a picture enough? I have one with me. -Bowmister

No, please look at the link I provided. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it says in bold that that page is a guideline for creating one. Show me the proof.

What if I INVENTED the bladderhammer. Would that be enough proff. HUH? -Bowmister

If you persist in creating this article without providing any reliable source to show the object actually exists then the article will just get deleted again and you may get blocked from editing for disruption. Wikipedia:VERIFIABILITY is policy. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep spamming my talk page, I will report you for vandalism -Bowmister

I'm answering your questions. How is that spamming? --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All right, you asked for it, the obese amount of code that's INJECTED into my talk page with your custom color name is far too much, and you took 3 edits to say the exact same thing.

I was correcting the link - I apologize it took two corrections. However this is not remotely vandalism. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, It is, because I never gave YOU permission to type on my talk page.

Anyone can use your talk page to communicate with you - they do not need your permission. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

With regard to your comments on User talk:NeilN: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to eat your children one day. -Bowmister

Stay cool? Stay cool! What kind of crap is this.

Reward for the stupidist argument on wiki

Wiki would like you to accept the award for creating the Stupidist TALK PAGE OF THE YEAR! Please, I ask for a speedy reply to allow us to give you an online digital picture and will will even give you a free GOOD JOB! and a pat on the back. Congrats!Then probably kick you off the site

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Bowmister, you will be blocked for vandalism. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 14:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with my talk page, then don't go there, as you stated before, talk pages are not part of wiki, and permission is not needed to change it. Not to mention, you were quick to anger yourself when I posted on yours, yet I am not allowed to remove one that clamis several defematory remarks about me?

You can certainly remove content from your talk page. What you cannot do is change the wording of my comments. --User:NeilN

- I reserve the right to delete your colors on your name, mostly because It make it IMPOSSIBLE to edit my own talk page with all the clutter.

Runescape Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to RuneScape. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 20:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I merely addressed what several quests involved, is this vandalism in any way?-Bowmister

Your edits were unconstructive. You might want to read WP:CTW before you do any more editing. Also, you can sign your edits using ~~~~. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 06:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC) I do believe, practically a year later, that I have returned with proof that I'm right and you're wrong. According to your own link, Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a controversial personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism; reinserting it despite multiple warnings is. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention may need to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well-intended, or outright vandalism.-Bowmister Yes, but unconstructive edits are also subject to speddy deletion, as is vandalism. In other words, dont put content on that is not worthy to be on wikipedia. --RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 18:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you

I hope you become a retired user, because all you do is nothing for wikipedia and harass evey user who tells you so, so please, don't harass us anymore, please don't vandalize, and please don't get into stupid arguments with other users, because wikipedia isn't about getting into stupid arguments, it is about imprioving our source of information, which you are hindering.

Regards, RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 18:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The simple fact that you have returned nearly a year later to hope I retired, is proof that you are rather obsessed with something that I moved away from a long time ago. Because I honestly don't care AT ALL about what you think a constructive edit is, please don't come onto my talk page another year later and attempt to criticize me.

P.S. (And change your name to something other than Pokemon, your grammar suggests you're older than five years old.)

Bowmister (talk) 21:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See, you always get into arguments like this. In am sorry, I don't want to start this again. Just all the personal attacks, etc. anyway, it seems that you give people a reason to call... just take away the Bladderhammer, please! So I will stop here, but i must strongly advise you to heed to other user's suggestions. And if I see any monkey buisness, I will let you know.

--RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 21:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS the Pokémon and the Poketto Monsuta games have very complicated words, storiess, dialogue and concepts (Or at least for a five year old), like I would seriously suggest an adult assistant or an in game assistant for five year olds (getting very carried away) so... yeah.