User talk:Bovineboy2008/Archives/2011/May
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bovineboy2008. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter
The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2011
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Re - Allied Artists Pictures Corporation, I noticed that you said it was not within the scope of WikiProject Film. There is a current dispute between Allied Artists Pictures Corporation (1999) and Allied Artists International, both of which are associated with owners who have past securities fraud related federal convictions for misleadingly named and marketed corporate shells associated with the classic Monogram Pictures. Both companies, AAI, and AAPC, appear to be trying to look like the classic movie company. Also United Assurance Company Ltd. is the parent of Hot TV Network, and Apple Juice Productions. Which WikiProject should such articles be categorized under? Thanks. PPdd (talk) 12:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 19:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
It's live
See Wikipedia:Future Films Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Generation P poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Generation P poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Orphaned non-free image File:Martha Marcy May Marlene.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Martha Marcy May Marlene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:11, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Irumbukkottai Murattu Singam.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Irumbukkottai Murattu Singam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Magic (upcoming film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
- Sorry if you have no interest in the nomination; I just thought I would notify you of this nomination in case you wanted to comment since you tagged the article with {{notability}}. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 18:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Movie Production Incentive rating
Hi there - thanks for taking the time to provide a rating to Movie production incentives in the United States. My team has been working on this article as part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy. I wanted to ask - what would you recommend to move the article above start class? We'd love to get to a C or B rating. Thanks for your feedback! Dglasser13 (talk) 15:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Dglasser13. I can definitely take a closer look into it. I'll have some down time this weekend where I can thoroughly assess it. BOVINEBOY2008 17:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- That would be much appreciated. Thanks! Dglasser13 (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
SUPER
You moved the page back for Super_(2010_American_film) and said "that is a stylization, titles should be in title case". Why is this the case? There are other wiki pages that have upper case names. Perfect examples are SUPER and SUPER (software). James Gunn has also stated that it should be completely capitalized. Would you mind clarifying this for me? --Triesault (talk) 02:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry that took so long to respond. I note that MOS:TM says to "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting 'official'". I'm not sure about the SUPER and SUPER (software) examples, but I would be willing to discuss it further at MOS:FILM or WP:FILM if you think this MOS isn't helpful here. BOVINEBOY2008 01:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Wow that quote pretty much sums up my question. Thank you for the information. --Triesault (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The 4th Reich.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The 4th Reich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Reviews
Any idea where to add reviews???? Karthik Nadar 05:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Reviews for what? What context? --Triesault (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SMCPlus.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SMCPlus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
Assessment
Hi can you assess the following articles and lists:
- Sivaji Ganesan
- List of awards and nominations received by Rajinikanth
- List of awards and nominations received by Kamal Haasan
- List of awards and honors confered on S. P. Balasubrahmanyam
--Thalapathi (Ping Back) 04:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
Orphaned non-free image File:Footnote.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Footnote.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:54, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi! You had left an edit on the page that now reads, "Do paise... is an upcoming bollywood film". This is factually wrong, as the film is already completed and has been screened in a film festival. Thanks. freewheeler 16:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manorathan (talk • contribs)
Talk:Fred: The Movie
You are invited to join the conversation at Talk:Fred: The Movie#Timelines. 117Avenue (talk) 22:39, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?