User talk:BourkeM

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spectral correlation density has been accepted

Spectral correlation density, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Providence

Hi! I'm here about this revert. If you don't mind, could you tell me which references were broken in this edit? I'd like to undo the reversion and fix the broken references, as there are now a few errors on the page (from what I recall, MOS:QUOTEMARKS, MOS:BOLDSYN, and a blacklisted link) that may be finicky to fix. Thanks! Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk) 01:49, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Me, Myself, and I are Here: Hello:). If you look at this revision, the first ten titles to references are gone. Is there a simple way to fix that? BourkeM ^Converse! 02:14, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see – I had changed the <sup> tags into ref tags because inexperienced editors sometimes try to replicate the floating numbers (^[1]) they see with markup. The title-less refs you see are those newly made refs – the old refs should have all their titles. If you don't mind, I'll revert it to that revision and add the titles once I have the time. Cheers! Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk) 02:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Me, Myself, and I are Here: That sounds good. If you show me the syntax I need to put to give them titles, I can do it as well :). BourkeM ^Converse! 02:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I left to eat dinner. It seems you've fixed it already!

I changed a couple of things: I named the references so there wouldn't be duplication, and fixed the stray curly single quotes and one ellipsis. As for adding titles to external links, it's as easy as putting square brackets ([]) around them (like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This this], which produces this).

It was nice to meet you. Happy editing! Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk) 03:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 16:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Providence talk topic move

Hi BourkeM.

I just wanted to inform you I moved your 25 May comment in Talk:Providence (religious movement) under another section entitled /*Reverting to old version*/.

I want to maintain /*Updating revert to 24 Oct '15 version*/ more as a place to report on the nitty-gritty on the edit, and as I am about to add more nitty-gritty, I didnt want your comment to be buried by that.--Kiyoweap (talk) 09:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]