User talk:Boulderboy123
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Boulderboy123, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Boulderboy123, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Larry Doby has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review #1
[edit]Right off the bat, I enjoyed the lead section of this article - it succinctly makes it clear why Doby is important (helping to break baseball's color barrier) and goes through a short but thorough description of his life in relation to his baseball achievements. I feel that the lead is a great microcosm of the rest of the article, and if I chose not to read any more I would still have a good understanding of Doby's significance and major life achievements. Having read the rest of the article, I found it also to be very well written and informative. Despite dealing with contentious topics like racism and segregation, the viewpoint stays neutral, aiming only to inform the reader as much as possible of Doby's life without inserting their own views. The extensive citation list (130 total) means that the article contains a wealth of different information and is chock full of relevant quotes, including many from Doby himself, as well as from Bill Veeck, the franchise owner who initially signed Doby. I felt the structure of the article was very good, going from his childhood, to initial experiences in college/segregated sports, to eventually his MLB career, as well as his stint as a team manager after he retired, in a logical order that made it easy to read through. The three sections included afterwards ("Second man", "Hall of Fame", and "Death and legacy") all seem appropriately placed - a specific section comparing Doby to Jackie Robinson seems almost essential due to their similar career trajectories and impacts on major league sports, and the article does a good, neutral job (using many topical quotes) to explain how Doby was continually in Robinson's shadow. I liked how that section was followed up with a section detailing his admittance into the National Baseball Hall of Fame as it both fits the article chronologically and shows that, while he may have been in Robinson's shadow, Doby was still a preeminent ball player in his own right. Finally, it only makes sense that the article concludes with his death and legacy, including quotes from multiple MLB commissioners about his influence, as well as places that have adopted his name since his death. Taken as a whole, this article is near perfect and is a great example of what a Wikipedia article should be - extremely informative with lots of insider quotes, but neutral enough that the reader will not feel swayed by whatever opinions are being established in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanm3195 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review #2
[edit]The lead section could use sources since currently there are none however, the rest of the article displays many sources with a variety of publishing and credentials that appear to be reliable even though there are news sources. There are many articles from New York press and newspapers along with MLB websites. The lead also briefly summarizes what is needed and what is to come in the following sections. There is a lot of information on the page and the sections are ordered properly, from beginning with the early stages of life to the legacy he has left behind. The article is completely neutral tone and I was presented with straight facts about the person, there was no specific audience targeted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bking22 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)