User talk:Bouguerche
Welcome
[edit]
|
| This is Bouguerche's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Microcotyle algeriensis has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
KylieTastic (talk) 21:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Minor edits
[edit]Hi Bouguerche! Great additions to some obscure species. I noticed you've been marking all of your edits as "minor edits". This should only be done for small spelling or grammar fixes, fixes to broken code or wikilinks, or the like. I would definitely call this a "major" edit. :) Edits generally shouldn't be marked as "minor" if you are adding or removing content or references. There's a page going into more detail about minor edits here: Help:Minor edit. Thanks! —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 17:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Microcotyle sebastisci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inland Sea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Microcotyle sebastis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Microcotyle rubrum) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Microcotyle rubrum.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
I'm afraid you have been very careless in pasting in text from another article without editing it afterwards. On the assumption that you'll quickly fix this, I'm approving it as it stands. Could you also add details and references to the host pages, as this woukd be very helpful in improving that one, too.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Thank you, I have been editing all day long, actually the text was edited ( host, locality, etymology and number of testes, clamps and other details). Thank you for notifying me, that was kind. It was "quickly fixed"! Have a nice evening. @Nick Moyes: Chahinez Bouguerche
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nick Moyes (talk) 20:56, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Microcotyle pentapodi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockingham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]
Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Gastrocotylidae. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 14:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Abdelaziz Bouteflika, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Pseudaxine kurra) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Pseudaxine kurra.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add urls to your references if these are available please. This helps users considerably.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nick Moyes (talk) 02:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing the two pages of Pseudaxine kurra and Pseudaxine indicana@Nick Moyes:. All available URLs have been added. I will look for more and them if I find any.
Best regards. ChahinezBouguerche
A page you started (Pseudaxine indicana) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Pseudaxine indicana.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add reference urls to aid users find the research papers that you probably acessed online yourself
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nick Moyes (talk) 02:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Allogastrocotyle) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Allogastrocotyle.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please would you address the clumsily-worded first sentence in Systematics?
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nick Moyes (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Sibitrema) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Sibitrema.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please refer to my comment below about our naming convention at WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nick Moyes (talk) 16:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA
[edit]Hello. Firstly, thanks for your work on creating articles on obscure taxa. It's a joy to see them amongst pages and pages of dreary footballers, minor TV characters and goodness knows what else! However, could I ask you to have a read of WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, please? As far as my understanding of this naming convention goes, you should not be creating two articles about a single species when that species is the only species within the genus that you are writing about. As such, I think you should merge all the content from Sibitrema poonui into Sibitrema, and simply create a redirect from the species to the genus article. I would prefer you to do this at your leisure, rather than me barge in and blank the species page, as I suspect there is content in one article that isn't in the other that you could quite sensibly rescue. Does that make sense? Many thanks, and keep up the good work (but mind your wording - sometimes your sentences do seem a little clumsily-written). Nick Moyes (talk) 16:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
@Nick Moyes: The sentence you considered ( clumsily-written) is "Allogastrocotyle was established to accommodate Allogastrocotyle bivaginalis from the gills of the rough scad" . If you read a bit more (or simply a bit )about Monogenean taxonomy you may change your mind about it, and realise that it is a commenly used sentence in taxonomy. Still, thank you for warning me about the (MONOTYPICFAUNA), I had no idea about it.
Cheers. ChahinezBouguerche
.
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for May 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plectanocotyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monticelli. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)