User talk:Bottracker
Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Disruptive editing at Cinema of Nigeria, adding content not supported by the source to which it is attached, adding spamlink and attempting to harass reporting editor by use of vandalism templates. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
{
Bottracker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not add spam to the article or add anything new to it for that matter. as this edit from 2009 shows [[1]]. That information was already in the article. It was removed without a reason. the user Amsaim started an edit war over it and that is when I gave him the warnings with the vandalism templates it was not to harass him. as being claimed it was to warn him to stop removing information from the article and I told him if he didn't agree with what was written he should provide a source that suggest otherwise and go aganist it. Other than that what was originallt written in the artilce will continue to be there. He didn't listern and he kept on disrupting the page and he removed my warning from his talk page. He reported me for vandalism but admins threw out his request and told him I didn't vandalise. Then out of know where LessHeard vanU blocks me not for even a day or an hour to say I have done something wrong or to warm me for what ever bad thing I have done but he just randomly blocks me indefinitely, for what? Trying to prevent information from being removed from an an article without any proper reason. This does not make any sense and the block is not in any way warranted
Decline reason:
Unwarranted? I disagree. I've looked at the material on the AN/I page, found at this location, and your recent edit history. I think User:LessHeard vanU was quite justified and that you haven't addressed your own disruptive behaviour. Accounting4Taste :talk 02:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bottracker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Accounting4Taste you said you saw what was written on the ANI and about me by the other user and so I guess I am guilty because it correct right? No it is not anyone can make a case and write whatever they want it is up to the admins to investigate the claims. Just like they did the 1st time Amsaim went notice board hunting trying to report me everywhere he could and it was thrown out because I hadn't vandalized as he claimed. Our Nigerian friend here: Amsaim just didn't like the fact that the article stated that the sucess of his country's film industry can also be attributed to the Ghanaian Flim industry because they often time colabroate. It is nothing more than that It wasn't because the information was a lie or that I was spaming or anything like that contrary to what he claim I DID NOT add it was already there. And anyone that knows this topic or that particular culture knows this. For example Genevieve_Nnaji who is a nigerian super movie star is signed to a Ghanaian record lable....I told Amsaim you can't remove information without a cause so find a source that suggest otherwise. He didn't listern and he kept on disrupting edits and that is when I left him the warning templated. And he claimed I harassed him. Where is the harassment in that? I have contributed to tons of articles on Wiki and if I am going to be blocked INDEFINATELY for something it should at least me for something I did wrong. My edits were called spam by Amsaim when he created his case aganist me and the 2 admins have jumped on it. But where is the spam? No one has still been able to tell me why I was blocked indefinately without reason or any pior warnings as wikepedia policies mandate. My block was unjustified and un warranted. And everything I have said is there for all to see whether I am lying or not.
Decline reason:
When YOU make an edit it is up to YOU to find a source to back it up, not vice versa. Your WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality does not work well here on Wikipedia. In addition - re-read WP:GAB ... you will find that WP:NOTTHEM applies clearly. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Additional note, if you have read WP:BLOCK, you'll know that "indefinite" simply means "until the community is satisfied that the block is no longer needed". (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC)