User talk:Botaki

Interconnector

First of all you had wrong impression about my work. I have no connections to Euroasia at all, not even indirect. My work is connected to programming and to energy. You added one full section connected to Ariadne Interconnector. Since you started you could maybe start new article about Ariadne Interconnector. That is Crete-Attica part that was previously part of Euroasia, but it is no more. Some data could and mentioning could be in our article, but really details about Ariadne tenders are not necessary. As I noticed you used only one source of information, energypress. It was very biased. Therefore you have not mentioned for example respected Kathimerini , that at the time Euroasia was not in delay (European bodies confirm that) and you not mentioned that IPTO actually took over Crete-Attica contrary to European law, as confirmed you European Commission. European Commission warned that Athens would face infringement procedures. https://www.kathimerini.gr/economy/business/1032201/freno-ston-diagonismo-admie-gia-diasyndesi-kritis/ https://www.financialmirror.com/2019/07/05/greece-starting-to-feel-squeeze-after-u-turn-on-cyprus-electric-cable/

But infringement process and trials could take lot of time. Therefore I suspect that Euroasia decided to give up Crete-Attica. That is something we don't know, but we know that not only European Commission but also ACER mentioned that Crete Aticca takover was contrary to European law. When Euroasia gave up they asked at least to be preserved interconnectivity on Crete and again there were some problems reported. --Karaol (talk) 11:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karaol I don't see any mention of the Crete-Attika being contrary to the European Law to the sites you link. Instead I have cited in the article that Council of Greece decided that it was legal. From my understanding, Euroasia feared that the Crete Attika part will not be compatible due to different voltage. Also Crete-Attika interconnector is part of the original plan for the interconnection. I don't think it is irrelevant. Instead the article looks very promotional to me. You mention half of what the sites cite. I cite a lot energypress because i could easily find a timeline of what was happening. I can cite more cites if you like. And lastly Crete Attika is already under construction for a year I think. Euroasia has not even started. So delays are valid to me. And I continue to believe you and vermed22 are probably connected with Euroasia Botaki (talk) 14:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I move the talk to the talk page of the article here Talk:EuroAsia_Interconnector Botaki (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]