User talk:BostonMA/RC Patrol Comments

This is an archive page. Please do not edit this page without permission. If you would like to comment, please do so at User talk:BostonMA. Thank-you.

Message from User:24.31.231.143

I got your messange! And thank you for sending me that Wiki-Mail. But how do you send messages? I don't know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.31.231.143 (talk • contribs)

1 vs. 100

I don't know how to contact you, BostonMA, but you should let my 1 vs. 100 edit stand. It is correct. I have first-person knowledge of which I write.

I'm curious: What made you think that my edit was bogus? Why did you assume I was wrong, vandalizing, playing in the sandbox, or whatever?

Warning vandals

Hey! Thanks for your dedication on Counter-Vandalism. However, you recently forgot to sign some of your warnings with your name and time. Please remember to do so, cause it helps users like me using VandalProof or other softwares know when the last warning was issued to the user. Thanks! :) --Deenoe 13:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. It's all good =) --Deenoe 13:29, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for removing that nonsense from my talk page. Much appreciated.-- thund e rboltz ^(Deepu) 04:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning

Howdy! I apologize for any sort of inconvenience that my peers might have made. My username is GofG, and I often edit from school. I have since gotten the teachers to make vandalizing Wikipedia a demerit-worthy offense, and as you can see the vandalism has slowed. I apologize again!68.156.179.102 14:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Khaskheli page

The 213.42.21.75 has again vandalized this page after you gave him last warning. Siddiqui 06:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Khaskheli page

I wrote that page so I feel obligated to defend it from vandalism. Thanks. Siddiqui 19:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re [1]

An explanation of what happened on User talk:216.168.125.177:

1. 216.168.125.177 removed his warnings [2]

2. DVD R W restored the warnings, and issued a block notice [3]

3. You restored the revision which contained the warnings, but not the block notice. [4]

4. I reverted to restore the block notice [5]

Looking at the logs for 216.168.125.177's talk page, it doesn't appear that any revisions were deleted (unless they were removed with oversight privileges, which seems unlikely.) It's nothing to worry about, though. I've had to roll back my own edits occasionally, when they don't produce the desired diffs. John254 02:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Rollback

=P it happens--Konst.able 12:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning removal

No problem. — Deckill e r 00:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I'm not sure how I can make the bot avoid a warn there... prob the best course of actions it tag it for a speedy, the bot won't revert and it'll be nuked pretty fast -- Tawker 00:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]