User talk:BossyAussie

BossyAussie, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BossyAussie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, BossyAussie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TSventon (talk) 13:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Graham87. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Jacob Barker. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Graham87 15:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone almost all of your red link removals. You can't possibly know enough about all the subjects you've edited to adequately evaluate which red links should be remove. If you continue to gratuitously remove red links, you may be blocked. Graham87 15:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this edit was disruptive and this edit linked to a neighbourhood rather tahn a creek. Furthermore, I'm curious about how you are finding which articles to edit, especially the draft pages. Graham87 16:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Rastegar (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is essentially an attempt at advertising

DGG ( talk ) 10:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges and being unresponsive to messages.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 14:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]