BOSSMAN00 TALK PAGE

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to USS Chosin (CG-65), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 18:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, still trying to learn everything there is to know... BossMan00Bossman00 (talk) 19:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chosin Help

{{helpme}} I added a section on USS Chosin (CG-65) "Ship Name" & added REF for ship name but it was deleted twice, I do not want a 3RR violation, but would like to know what I can do to fix the page so that I can edit it properly, and not get it reverted. I did site a reference and posted it. Source: http://www.chosin.navy.mil/Site%20Pages/About.aspx Bossman00 (talk) 20:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could try asking on the talk page why it keeps getting deleted. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USS Chosin (CG-65)

Frankly, there isn't much you can do. We discourage straight copy-paste from other websites (which is what you were doing). Also, we don't need that much information about the naming of a ship unless the article is as developed as our best ship articles (Iowa class battleship, and USS Missouri (BB-63) for instance). Your source was integrated as a reference on the article for where the name came from in an abbreviated way. -MBK₀₀₄ 14:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I was just trying to help with info. As I stated before, I am new at this and am wanting to learn! Just need some help so I don't stray off course. Bossman00 (talk) 15:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To echo MBK, copy and pasting is bad. =) In the early days, almost every U.S. ship article on here was a straight copy and paste from DANFS to here. (see this for an example) It wasn't so much of a deal then because DANFS is in the public domain and Wikipedia needed articles to attract new users—also, the few users that were here had other things to do, such as improving the most important articles to impress people who came here. :D Nowadays, however, we have most of the warship articles that we need, even if they are still an slomost-exact copy of the DANFS version (maybe with two changes from that--not many). As a result, today's mission is to improve these articles by using other, third-party, sources so that we can tell an unbiased version of every ship's history. (if you didn't notice, DANFS is a little biased!) See what I've been doing on the USS Nevada (BB-36) article. I've been trying to move away from DANFS and use all of the references that I can get to to improve any bias/any inaccuracy. Try looking for the ship on Google Books or other sites...maybe The New York Times? (like this maybe?) Anyway, if you have any questions, feel free to ask away my talk page. Cheers! —the_ed 17— 15:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you may see, I am new. I am really struggling with getting the grasp of all the coding and DOs/DON'Ts. I would like help but don't know how to ask effectivly. I would like to get more James Dietz Paintings up on WIKI, but my first one is being nominated for deletion. I am starting to get frustrated cause I have read everything that MBK sent me, so that I don't get in trouble, but still having issues. Can you help??? Bossman00 (talk) 15:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a stab at trying to answer... What you're going through is very normal for newbies, and infact it is understandable that you are getting frustrated. Writing articles is a difficult thing to do from scratch, and WP:NOTABILITY is paramount. I do not believe that the article that I've put up for AFD does not meet that requirement. It isn't a disparagement at the actual work of art or your writing abilities (I actually like that painting). Might I suggest you find a wikiproject to get involved with. -MBK₀₀₄ 16:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your article in do sandbox

Hi again. I literally took only one glance at the article you are making in your sandbox and thought this: "No inline citations". If you moved it to its own article right now, then the article would be tagged with a {{nofootnotes}} tag right away....(if the subject of the article is notable =]) Anyway, good luck with it! Cheers, —the_ed 17— 15:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Dietz

What is your legal relationship, if any, with Mr Dietz? You seem to be posting a lot of articles about his paintings. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no legal relationship with Dietz. I have only met him twice in person and own 2 of his Limited Edition Prints. I only enjoy his artwork. Bossman00 (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then my entirely unqualified advice to you is to refrain from posting copies of his works to Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates under a copyright licensing regime in which you probably do not have the right to copy Mr Dietz's pictures. If you like him, avoid infringing his copyright. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then how are other famous paintings i.e. Mona Lisa alowed on WIKI?

The short answer is that Leonardo da Vinci has been dead for considerably more than 70 years, and so his copyright has expired. There's a lot more to it than that, but I would encourage you to gain basic familiarity both with copyright law and with the GFDL before considering this course of action. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VFD

It's a 15-member volunteer fire department... Neutrality^talk 17:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So what is the minimum ?? Cause there are a lot of other Fire Depts with about the same of Fire Fighters. Also with Less info. If there is a set minimum, then most Volunteer Fire Department would never meet any critiria for being published
Shanksville Volunteer Fire Department 38 Members
Fredericktown Community Fire District 26 Members
Beaver Township Fire DepartmentNext to no info and no references
Memphis Fire ServicesNext to no info and no references
Bossman00 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bossman00, the reason these pages were deleted is that they have been classified as "Non-notable". In order for a new page to be added to Wikipedia, it must meet the criteria outlined on this page. I will agree with you that not all departments meet this requirement, and most in fact don't. If someone wants to take it upon themselves to start deleting fire department pages, I won't stop them. New page patrollers are very active these days and look for new pages that don't meet these criterion, so that's why your pages were deleted. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 21:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cove Acres LOGO.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cove Acres LOGO.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]