User talk:Born on Setons
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Born on Setons, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! :-ChanderForYou 13:40, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance
[edit]Please read WP:VG/USERREVIEW. You will see that Metacritic, or any other, user reviews are NOT WP:RS.
As we are skirting dangerously close to an Edit War and violation of 3 Reverts Rule I will give an opportunity to remedy your mistake prior to doing so myself. -Oosh (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have once again reverted you changes, in accordance with WP:VG/USERREVIEW, as you have been unable or unwilling to do so yourself.
- If you disagree with my actions the appropriate response is to discuss in the article talk page, not to start an edit war, if you disagree with the guideline I have used to justify actions then you need to take it up with WikiProject Video games.
- Regards, -Oosh (talk) 23:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have once again reverted you changes, in accordance with WP:VG/USERREVIEW, as you have been unable or unwilling to do so yourself.
"Unable or unwilling to defend yourself..." I thought that you would read the talk page for Forged Alliance, but I guess you never read it.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Born on Setons, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]Hi Born on Setons!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:47, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
|
Do not add essays like that to project guideline pages like that. In order to change a guideline, you need to bring it up for discussion on the relevant talk page first and then if a group of editors agree with your addition, it will be added to the article. You cannot add onto a policy just to get your way in a discussion, as it appears you are doing due to the Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance article, where you were edit warring. If you persist in edit warring on this website, you will find your days here numbered.—Ryulong (琉竜) 10:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Calling something an essay really doesn't mean much. You removed properly cited material without giving any reason. Also please don't try to be a mind reader. The point of a policy should be the policy not the intentions of the people producing the policy. As it stands the policy does not deal with user ratings, this is something that must be corrected, if you disagree with what was written then amend it with proper sources.