User talk:BorkBorkGoesTheCode
Begin flamewar. (After reading talk pages, I have evidence that this will happen).
Your opposes on the RFC
[edit]Just so you are aware there is no need to "blanket oppose" vote any of the options; in fact, you've made them look like support votes and may be mistaken by a counter for one. Please remove them both for this reason as well as the fact that you have very little edits outside of that RFC - see WP:SPA for why we usually reject such votes. Thanks, --PatientZero talk 16:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- @OhanaUnited: Given that the RfC this user voted on disproportionately affects new users, don't you think that they would be the ones that we really want to hear from (and not necessarily those who already met the 500 edits & 30 days old requirement) because it impacts them more so than us? It's not like this account is created exclusively to vote on the RfC. OhanaUnitedTalk page 23:15, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- @OhanaUnited: Hello, OhanaUnited. Feel free to talk to me as if I were both here and a real person. BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 07:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Patient Zero: Do you oppose the right to vote? BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 07:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Patient Zero: What is the proper way to oppose an entire suggestion? BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 08:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Patient Zero: The name of my vote had nothing to do with yours, in case you thought I was insulting you. BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 09:30, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Bork, the best thing to do is not add your oppose votes to the proposal as they may well be mistaken for supports, so it is best to not vote on them (I do apologise for my immediate suggestion of you being an SPA). You can comment on the talk page if you wish. IP, I do not understand, please explain. --PatientZero talk 09:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- I understand now. --PatientZero talk 09:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Bork, the best thing to do is not add your oppose votes to the proposal as they may well be mistaken for supports, so it is best to not vote on them (I do apologise for my immediate suggestion of you being an SPA). You can comment on the talk page if you wish. IP, I do not understand, please explain. --PatientZero talk 09:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, BorkBorkGoesTheCode! Thank you for your contributions. I am Hexafluoride and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —Hexafluoride Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk 16:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
30-500 blocks everybody.
[edit]Has a study of edit frequency been conducted? Is the edit rate of 30-500 articles lower than non 30-500 articles?
Time Travel: Is It Real?
[edit]Would any interested time travelers appear in front of my house in exactly one hour? Thank you. BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 04:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Checking in.BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 06:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi BorkBorkGoesTheCode! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 10:24, Sunday, October 9, 2016 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Extended confirmed protection policy RfC
[edit]You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk 15:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Requesting help on June (company) article
[edit]I noticed that you flagged June as sounding too promotional and in hindsight, I see your point and want to help improve it. Could I bounce some editing suggestions off you to make the article more neutral in tone? Let me know! Kshanti07 (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
I posted some suggested edits to the Juna talk page. Open to any thoughts or feedback! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:June_(company) Kshanti07 (talk) 23:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)