User talk:Boris Godunov

Welcome!

Hello, Boris Godunov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --PaxEquilibrium 18:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Demografija

Jesi li siguran za ove nove podatke što si unio? Ja sam prvobitne unio iz informatora Visočke općine. --HarisM 01:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Da. Podaci koji se seljakaju ovdje ondje svuda po netu o nacionalnom sastavu po opštinama u Bosni i Hercegovini iz 1991. godine uzeti su ugl. iz podataka koji pokazuju preliminarne rezultate tog popisa, npr. može se naći na hdt magazinu ili nešto slično. Podaci koje sam dao su službeni rezultati popisa iz 1991. u BiH.To je knjiga koja se zove Narodnosni sasatv stanovništva SR BiH, po opštinama i naseljima, izdanje Republički zavod za statistiku, Sarajevo. Inače te podatke sam postavio i na stranicu Wikipedia koja se zove Popis 1991. Bosna i Hercegovina, mislim Census in Bosnia-Herzegovina 1991. ili slično. Imaš podatke za svih 109 opština i to za grupe Muslimani (Bošnjaci), Srbi, Hrvati, Jugosloveni i ostali (odn. ostale nacionalnosti, neopredeljeni, regionalno opredeljeni i nepoznati zajedno). Inače na bosanskoj Wikipediji sam postavio podatke za sve opštine, a za oko 50 opština (koliko sam stigao) dao sam podatke i za naseljena mesta. Za Visoko nisam još, možda uskoro, ima puno naseljenih mesta u opštini Visoko oko 80-tak, pa nije baš lak posao... :)) U svakom slučaju pozdrav!

Boris Godunov

Pa, vjerujem da su ti podaci tačni, samo sam pitao jer sam uočio malo veću promjenu od skoro 2000 manje stanovnika u samom gradu za razliku od prošlog podatka. Sa 15 na 13 hiljada. Jel' i to provjereno? Hvala na odgovoru, svakako! --HarisM 02:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gorica (Čapljina)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gorica (Čapljina), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jgames.co.uk/title/%C4%8Capljina. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Struge

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Struge, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jgames.co.uk/title/%C4%8Capljina. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trebižat

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Trebižat, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jgames.co.uk/title/%C4%8Capljina. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dretelj

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dretelj, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jgames.co.uk/title/%C4%8Capljina. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Podaci iz Zavod za statistiku Bosne i Hercegovine - Bilten no.234, Sarajevo 1991

Pozdrav Boris, interesiralo bi me da li možeš prenjeti podatke iz ovog izdanja po naseljima na wiki?--Čeha (razgovor) 22:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zar nisu svi to podatci na hrvatskoj vikipediji?(LAz17 (talk) 04:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Koliko znam jesu, ali s obzirom da je boris bio jedan od onih koji ih je gore postavljao ne bi bilo loše da se isto napravi i na engleskoj wiki. Razjasnile bi se neke stvari.--Čeha (razgovor) 06:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boris nije bio na vikipediji vec dugo vreme... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Boris_Godunov ... samo to tolko, neznam ako mozemo da ocekujemo odgovor od njega uskoro. (LAz17 (talk) 04:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Ikavica

pa samo sam ostavio link svog profila na enwiki pošto ga nemam na srwiki Luka Jačov (talk) 12:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possibly address and answer questions in English?

Hi Boris. While some people may be able to read your talk page comments - and I hesitate to mention any South Slav language following an WP:ARBCOM decision I can link to - it would be better if you could write in English.--Shirt58 (talk) 10:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vrginmost

Pozdrav Borise, pišem ti na srpskohrvatskom je mi je tako lakše. Nominirao sam tvoj članak Vrginmost (Gvozd) za brisanje jer se radi o dupliranju već postojećeg članka. Budući da su općinske vlasti službeno promijenile naziv naselja dovoljno će biti preimenovati postojeći članak. Nadam se da je to i tebi ok i da ovo nećeš shvatiti kao neprijateljsku gestu. Lijep pozdrav.--MirkoS18 (talk) 11:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eto vidiš taj dio sa nazivom opštine nisam ni shvatio da nije u nadležnosti Opštinskih vlasti. Nakon što si mi rekao i meni se učinilo da bi se tu moglo pojaviti neslaganja u interpretacijama jer je ujedno riječ i o članku o opštini i o naselju. Međutim, bojim se da ćemo sa tvojom idejom napraviti rizičan presedan gdje će nam se uskoro početi pojavljivati odvojeni članci o naseljima i o opštinama u RH (o čemu je do sada postojao konsenzus koji je stvoren upravo kada su neki pokušali napraviti takve duple članke za sve opštine). Baš zbog toga ja i dalje mislim da je jedino racionalno rješenje da se preimenuje postojeći stari članak, a da se u rubrici općina do konačne izmjene naziva općine piše Općina Gvozd (ako je to još uvijek službeni naziv kako kažeš). Takođet, ako je to i dalje naziv općine tada i u popisu općina i u poveznicama koje se odnose na općinu treba pisati Gvozd, a ta veza treba voditi na stari članak koji sada nosi ime Vrginmost (ma da meni nije jasno da se i ime općine ne mijenja automatski sa promjenom naziva naselja, ali ne razumijem se u taj dio). Ovu zbunjujuću situaciju treba objasniti u posebnom kraćem dijelu teksta tako da čitatelj što bolje razumije. Lijep pozdrav.--MirkoS18 (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vrginmost

I've tolerated one move with zero explanation, but I'm not going to let it slide any more. Use the fine talk page.

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on Vrginmost, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.

--Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2012 (UT-C)

The problem is that you are move-warring with no information in edit summaries and move logs.

I resent the implication that I'm "threatening you as if this was the Croatian Wikipedia".That's exactly the kind of attitude WP:ARBMAC prohibits - kindly lose it. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they did not appear constructive. Also do not add a new content without giving a valid reason for the that in the edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 07:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use the talk page as a forum or soapbox for discussing the topic. The talk page is for discussing how to improve the article. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 13:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 13:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]