User talk:Borinquen96

Welcome!

Hello, Borinquen96, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Malerooster (talk) 14:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ustaše

Please do not continue to add incorrect or inaccurate categories which are disputed by other editors. Please seek consensus on the talk page. Quis separabit? 19:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have similar concerns. I don't know what Borinquen96 did with Ustaše, but saw the addition of a category "alt-right" on the page of The Rebel Media with no reliable source and without reflecting what's in the article. I also saw "Opposition to Islam in Europe" added to Chetniks and Golden Dawn. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 23:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Pearl Harbor

Hi. What to put in the "Result" field in this article's infobox has been the subject of extensive discussion, so I have reverted your changes and request that you go to the article talk page at Talk:Attack on Pearl Harbor and discuss your proposed changes there. Please do not restore your edit until you have a WP:consensus to do so. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:47, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling back your edits

As you appear to be a sock of the blocked editor Juantheman96, who also used the sock Borinquen1996, I've started rolling back your edits as block evasion. I've also asked an admin to take a look into it and block you if they agree. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any independent editor who feels that any of the contribs I rolled back should be restored is welcome to do so without discussing it with me. Beyond My Ken (talk)