User talk:Booze broads and bullets

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Booze broads and bullets, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Brian 21:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

Copyright issue

Please don't add copyrighted text to Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Sorry, I Love You, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! Brian 21:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

Hi there. I'd like to welcome you to Wikipedia. However, you should know that your username verges on the unacceptable, and another administrator may decide to block you on those grounds (I considered doing it myself, in fact). I therefore strongly suggest that you choose a new username before you become too attached to this one.

If another administrator does block you for a bad username, then your IP will be automatically blocked for 24 hours (a necessary precaution against vandals who create dozens of garbage usernames in a row); if this happens, simply e-mail me via the link on my userpage, and I will fix things for you.

And Lovestruck sounds like a really cool movie. DS 14:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop the copyright violations

Please stop posting material that you've cut and pasted from websites. I've reported three now and it appears I have more to do. If you keep posting copyright material, I'll have to ask an admin to block your account. Thanks Brian 22:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

License tagging for Image:2f74-1-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2f74-1-.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:9690-2-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:9690-2-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Bakekang1.3-2-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bakekang1.3-2-.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Heart of Asia-1-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Heart of Asia-1-.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:9217-2-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:9217-2-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Aquano.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aquano.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 22:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bakekang movie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bakekang movie.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 22:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Epguides-1-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Epguides-1-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sunshine_as_bakekang.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunshine_as_bakekang.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kahit Wala Ka Na (AfD discussion)

Moved to User talk:Tonyboy092392
Moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kahit Wala Ka Na

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-11-22 19:24Z

As far as we can tell, these articles created by you and User:Tonyboy092392 are hoaxes:

and maybe Princess Charming

If they are not, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kahit Wala Ka Na. Thanks. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-11-22 19:32Z

Lupin III (Philippine TV series)

Hi, at Lupin III (Philippine TV series), I had removed these three lines, which you then reinserted:

* as Jigen
* as Detective Zenigata
* as Clarisse d'Cagliostro

I explained in the edit history that they do not belong until we have actors' names. If you would like to indicate that these are characters with no known actors, that should be noted somewhere outside the list. - furrykef (Talk at me) 01:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found them put back again. Ignoring the advice of your fellow editors is pretty rude. - furrykef (Talk at me) 20:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you unwilling to cooperate? - furrykef (Talk at me) 01:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Charming

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Princess Charming which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review.

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Princess Charming which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. Tubezone 19:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from posting or reposting this kind of stuff until you have an official network announcement to refer us to. Tubezone 22:31, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vivo Ouano

Come on now, I don't even see him on TV, lol. --Howard the Duck 13:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey look, you better cooperate/tell me Vivo Ouano shouldn't be a redirect. He is not notable enough to be in Wikipedia. --Howard the Duck 14:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of top rated Philippine Dramas

List of top rated Philippine Dramas has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might be based on your own conclusions or research, rather than published ideas. Please review Wikipedia:No original research for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kahit_wala_ka_na.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kahit_wala_ka_na.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 01:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cast-1-.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cast-1-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now and Forever: Duyan

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Now and Forever: Duyan, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.igma.tv/showabout.php?showid=176, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Now and Forever: Duyan and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Now and Forever: Duyan with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Now and Forever: Duyan. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Now and Forever: Duyan with a link to the details.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Now and Forever: Duyan/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Now and Forever: Duyan saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Shrumster 11:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Now and Forever: Tinig==

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Now and Forever: Tinig, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gmapinoytv.com/v2/index.php?view=9&articleid=3186, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Now and Forever: Tinig and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Now and Forever: Tinig with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Now and Forever: Tinig. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Now and Forever: Tinig with a link to the details.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Now and Forever: Tinig/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Now and Forever: Tinig saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Shrumster 11:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Bakekanglayout.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Bakekanglayout.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shrumster 11:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with List of Bakekang episodes

Hello. Concerning your contribution, List of Bakekang episodes, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.igma.tv/showeps.php?showid=197. As a copyright violation, List of Bakekang episodes appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. List of Bakekang episodes has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:List of Bakekang episodes. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at List of Bakekang episodes, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Shrumster 18:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Muli (Philippine TV series)

An editor has nominated Muli (Philippine TV series), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muli (Philippine TV series) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Magic Kamison

An editor has nominated Magic Kamison, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Kamison and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magic Kamison & others

Please don't do things like removing AfD notices. It is vandalism and can lead to your being blocked. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:55, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Super Twins. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are however welcome to comment the deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 02:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Bn bakekang.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Bn bakekang.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shrumster 05:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Messages

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia. We cannot accept copyrighted material for legal reasons, as it is not compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License. Your contributions must be in your own words. Thank you. Shrumster 05:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shrumster 05:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shrumster 05:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion

Could you please explain why you made this edit after you had been told not to remove AfD notices? I also notice that you made this edit but didn't finish the AfD process. I have on a temporary basis commented out the AfD. If you wish to complete the process then please do so by following the explanation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion or remove the notice. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Shrumster 15:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Magic Kamison, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. _→AzaToth 16:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Super Twins, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --- Tito Pao 16:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for removing AfD notices after being warned. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .

HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use proper licensing tags

Wikipedia welcomes all constructive contributions to our encyclopedia, but your recent addition appears to be copyrighted text or image. Unfortunately, we cannot accept copyrighted material, for it is legally incompatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, under which Wikipedia is published. Please contribute in your own words with external material as a reference. Thank you.

Please use the proper licensing tag and provide a valid fair-use rationale whenever you upload pictures. For example, when you upload a picture of a promotional material for a tv series, please don't tag it as a "movie poster" or a "DVD cover". Wikipedia has to deal with a lot of legal issues whenever editors do that. Also, by the US/UK Fair-use/Fair-dealing laws (and Philippine copyright law as well, which applies to your additions) you must provide a fair use rationale whenever you upload a picture with a fair-use claim. Lastly, please specify the owner of the copyright of the material you upload and specify the source (please be very specific) of the image. Just a few steps such as these will contribute greatly to your standing as a valued Wikipedia editor. Thank you. Shrumster 07:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Victorneri.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Victorneri.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair-use tag. Image is neither a movie poster, neither is the subject media of the image a movie.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Victorneri.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 06:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Valeria&kristoff.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Valeria&kristoff.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair-use tag. Picture is neither a film poster, nor is the subject media of the picture a film (it is a tv series).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Valeria&kristoff.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 06:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Yasmiencharming.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Yasmiencharming.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair-use tag. This is neither a film poster, nor is the subject of the picture a film (it is a TV series).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Yasmiencharming.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 06:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Lovikristalpoe.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Lovikristalpoe.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair-use tag. This is neither a film poster, nor is the subject of the picture a film (it is a TV series).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Lovikristalpoe.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 06:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Castofbakekang.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Castofbakekang.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair-use tag. This is neither a film poster, nor is the subject of the picture a film (it is a TV series).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Castofbakekang.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 06:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Cast-1-.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Cast-1-.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use claim. This is not a logo.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Cast-1-.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 09:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mn princess.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mn princess.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shrumster 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fantastikids-titlecard.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fantastikids-titlecard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shrumster 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Hdr05-1-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hdr05-1-.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shrumster 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Cast of atlantika.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Cast of atlantika.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. This is not a DVD cover.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Cast of atlantika.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Atlantika rudy fernandez.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Atlantika rudy fernandez.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. This is not a DVD cover.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Atlantika rudy fernandez.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Atlantika jean garcia.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Atlantika jean garcia.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. This is not a screenshot from a film, and neither is the subject of the image, "Atlantika", a film (it is a TV series).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Atlantika jean garcia.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Atlantika cherry pie picache.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Atlantika cherry pie picache.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. This is obviously not a DVD cover.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Atlantika cherry pie picache.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:55a5-2-.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:55a5-2-.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shrumster 10:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bakekang cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bakekang cover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shrumster 10:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Super-twinsnew.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Super-twinsnew.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. Obviously not a magazine cover. The image was taken from the iGMA website, no fair use rationale was given, and the exact soruce was not given.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Super-twinsnew.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 11:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Asian-treasuresnew.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Asian-treasuresnew.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. Obviously not a magazine cover. The image was taken from the iGMA website, no fair use rationale was given, and the exact soruce was not given.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Asian-treasuresnew.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 11:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Bakekangnew.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Bakekangnew.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. Obviously not a magazine cover. The image was taken from the iGMA website, no fair use rationale was given, and the exact soruce was not given.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Bakekangnew.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 11:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Valeria&kristoff.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Valeria&kristoff.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. Obviously not a magazine cover. The image was taken from the iGMA website, no fair use rationale was given, and the exact soruce was not given.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Valeria&kristoff.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 11:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Lovikristalpoe.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Lovikristalpoe.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. Obviously not a magazine cover. The image was taken from the iGMA website, no fair use rationale was given, and the exact soruce was not given.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Lovikristalpoe.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 11:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Yasmiencharming.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Yasmiencharming.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use tag. Obviously not a magazine cover. The image was taken from the iGMA website, no fair use rationale was given, and the exact soruce was not given.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Yasmiencharming.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shrumster 11:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your original contributions are welcome.

Indefinite block

You seem to have some major misunderstanding of what you can upload in the way of images to Wikipedia. A look through your talk page would suggest that you really need to seek some help on what images are acceptable. It is also obvious that you are unresponsive to requests or comments from other people. Because of this I have blocked you indefinitely. As soon as you wish to discuss you image uploading and your other copyright violations please use the {{unblock}} template, along with a reason why you should be unblocked, and somone will be along to help you. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Super-twinsnew.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super-twinsnew.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]