User talk:Booozzzzzzz
Welcome
[edit]Hello Booozzzzzzz and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Skanderbeg, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 01:49, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bosnian Church without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Bosnian Church
[edit]Hello Booozzzzzzz, thanks for reaching out. Just a couple of advices: your edits removed a large part of sourced content and replaced it with unsourced claims. Even without analyzing your changes, this is usually seen as an incorrect behaviour within Wikipedia project. Wikipedia is based on verifiable sources thus, first of all, when you add some possibly controversial information, you are expected to provide sources to support your additions. Beside this you also deleted properly sourced content without discussing it with anyone, and this is also seen as an incorrect action. I suggest to post your doubts on the aticle's talk page, carefully explain why you think the text you removed is not appropriate and wait for someone to reply. Also I suggest you to provide the text you are going to add to the article with verifiable references. Cheers and happy editing, --DoebLoggs (talk) 12:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
There is so much false information in that text. Just one of examples: Bogumils, by records less than 10,000 in Bulgaria, which some of them removed to todays Bosnia, were exterminated. There are no historical continuities with today's Bosniaks. Also, there are no remains and evidence of the Bosnian church, except for the stećak tombstones, which have nothing to do with it. Also, the theory about the Bogumis Church has already been rejected, except by some Bosnian historians. And my sources: any peer reviewed INTERNATIONAL study.