User talk:Boolean lint

Me, Harlz123, and my partner, Rhobday30 are interested in expanding or creating a page for Delaware v. Prouse, California v. Carney, Pennsylvania v. Finley, Holden v. Hardy, Whitus v. Georgia, and United States v. Dionisio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harlz123 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The list my partner, samrienzi,and I, Dorakr85, came up with is Island Trees Schools v. Pico, Tinker v. Des Moines Independant Community School District, and Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC.

Hi! I answered your question here: http://ask.wikiedu.org/question/284/is-there-a-way-to-assign-groups-so-that-i-can-see-them-in-the-dashboard/

--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We (Fredjl00) and I, are not sure if this is the right place to post this, but some of our ideas for the project are FTC v. Vemma, or creating a page on the case Stormans, Inc. v. (various members of the Washington's dept. of health, and also maybe Maher v. Roe.

SunflowerME113 (talk) 22:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Owl_1001, Daler21, and TomBrady666 came up with a list of potential topics to edit for wikipedia. One topic had an under developed page and the others did not have an existing page available. Roberts v. City of Boston has an under developed page. State v. Buzzard, Bakeshop Act of 1895, Clark v. Board of School Directors, and Taylor. Porter and Ford did not have existing pages. Our group believes these pages would be interesting to develop further for the Wikipedia Encyclopedia.

Owl 1001 (talk) 20:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maykay343 (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)maykay343 and Maykay343 (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2015 Maykay343 (talk) 11:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC) ramim15 (talk)are looking to edit caucusing, anti-patriotism, political suicide, and suffrage atelier. Unsure if we have to edit court cases, so we came up with these topics that are underdeveloped pages. These topics have to do with civil rights and liberties in and of themeselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maykay343 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blue2433 (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC) madtalksalot, marissanicosia and I we discussed doing our Wiki project on either Zelman v Simmons-Harris, Gideon v Wainwright, or Ogden v Saunders — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.75.126.196 (talk) 15:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miah B (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Miah B, thought it would be interesting to see what more I could possibly add to the case pages Whitney v California, Plessy v Ferguson, or create a page for Clark v Board of School Directors. --Miah B (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mazuj48 (talk) 12:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mazuj48, Vicco2012, and Bobo695 are interested in discussing issues surrounding the LGBT community specifically focusing on transgender issues, DASA (The Dignity for all Students Act) and prominent court rulings on these topics.

Eagles1234_1 and PoetRogue13 are thinking about discussing any of the topics of Roberts v. City of Boston, Barron v. Baltimore, Clark v. Board of School Directors, Ross v. McIntyre, or United States v. Schwimmer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagles1234 1 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Fredjll00) and I (SunflowerME113) have been working on our summary and we put it in my sandbox (can you see it if it's in my sandbox?) Also we have not yet cited it because we are unsure of how to cite government documents. However, we did put the URLS in our sandbox. All of the information we have used has been straight from the court paperwork. After we did this work, we noticed that you mentioned to use a case with a speaking component. we didn't see this until we were ready to post this in each of our sandboxes, unfortunately, but we wondering if what we're doing is ok? SunflowerME113 (talk) 01:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Boolean lint! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Notecardforfree (talk) 10:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

-- Notecardforfree (talk) 10:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing SCOTUS articles

Hi Boolean lint! First and foremost, I want to welcome you to Wikipedia -- it is always exciting to see college professors integrate Wikipedia into their curricula. I also want to touch base with you about writing articles for United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) cases because I noticed that students in your Civil Rights and Liberties class plan to edit articles for SCOTUS cases. I encourage your students to become familiar with MOS:LAW and WP:SCOTUS/SG, which provide style guidelines for SCOTUS articles. Per MOS:LAW#Citations and referencing, editors are encouraged to use the Bluebook citation style, which is now considered (for better or worse) the de facto lingua franca of American legal citations. Editors are also encouraged to provide inline citations after every sentence that makes an assertion about the holding of a case; these citations should reference the page(s) of the United States Reports (or the case's slip opinion) on which that holding appears (see also WP:CITEDENSE). Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions, and I look forward to seeing your class' contributions! Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]